minimal has quit [Read error: Network is unreachable]
minimal has joined #openwrt-devel
cmonroe has joined #openwrt-devel
shibboleth has joined #openwrt-devel
shibboleth has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
shibboleth has joined #openwrt-devel
gladiac is now known as Guest76
gladiac has joined #openwrt-devel
<dangole> rsalvaterra: exactly, so we should not even start using it, but implement what upstream demanded (which is not hard to do)
<rsalvaterra> Yes, just a bit more intrusive, for sure.
<rsalvaterra> In any case, I'll defer implementing the BusyBox part until there's a more upstreamable version of kabel's iproute2 patch.
Guest76 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
nlowe has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
<hurricos> so one of the casualties of mvsw61xx being dropped was the loss of drivers for avanta SoCs
<hurricos> Avanta is a feroceron, but unlike kw is clocked higher, can use DDR3, but cannot be kwbooted
<hurricos> it's sort of a "black sheep" (considering both armada and kirkwood are amenable to kwboot)
<hurricos> s/feroceron/feroceon/*
cmonroe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<hurricos> there was an ... interesting discussion about Avanta on Doozan here: https://forum.doozan.com/read.php?2,78499,page=10 .... but I don't think it was productive, lol
<hurricos> that said, bodhi's commentary on that page about the simplicity of porting the DSA driver suggests that it might be achievable
<hurricos> ultimately the problem is that without kwboot, uhh
<hurricos> it's hard to care about the SoC :^)
<hurricos> I say avanta can't be kwbooted, but msdos3/8086k has Github releases of U-boot which include a uart.bin file
<hurricos> and I can't imagine what that is if not a kwbootable file :squinting:
<hurricos> documentation is hard.
<hurricos> yeah, it's ... compiled using Marvell's doimage -T uart, which assembles it for use with Xmodem, but ...
<hurricos> OK! The processor is kwbootable ... https://forum.doozan.com/read.php?2,78499,page=3
<hurricos> *and* it boots with a preamble.
<hurricos> What makes this an interesting target for me is the number of devices that make use of it. Aruba AP135 comes to mind as an abundandly available device.
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
cmonroe has joined #openwrt-devel
<hurricos> I was able to pull a copy of the AP135's flash, fwiw. The OEM's u-boot on most Aruba devices does some RSA verification, but ...
<hurricos> this one puts the cert in storage, and it has a copy of mm.
<hurricos> I will say though
<hurricos> I'm digging through flash and finding things like
<hurricos> "what do ya want for nothing?
<hurricos> and I figure this is just a song-reference, but ...
<hurricos> then I find repeated references to it being used as some kind of IV or sample string in u-boot crypto code
<hurricos> in certain vendor SDKs
<Namidairo> md5/sha-1 test case
<owrt-snap-builds> Build [#424](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/22/builds/424) of `ipq40xx/generic` failed.
<owrt-snap-builds> Build [#425](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/68/builds/425) of `at91/sama5` failed.
shibboleth has quit [Quit: shibboleth]
<hurricos> Namidairo
<hurricos> Let me tell you
<hurricos> that right there
<hurricos> is the highest quality sleuthing I have ever seen
<hurricos> and you are consistently doing it
<hurricos> I don't know how
<hurricos> but I appreciate it :^)
<hurricos> Yep, this is absolutely it. Other test strings are present right around this spot in the dump.
<hurricos> ... for those interested in the AP-135 rambling, here's the post -- https://forum.openwrt.org/t/adding-support-for-aruba-ap135/118032
<hurricos> contains a link to the dump, too. :^)
dangole has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
philipp64 has quit [Quit: philipp64]
minimal has quit []
<neggles> hurricos: ooooo
<Namidairo> can't get excited over 11n hardware in 2022 lol
<neggles> Namidairo: true, but 802.11n gear often (as in this case) uses miniPCIe cards for radios
<neggles> u p g r a d e s
<neggles> it's far less common on 802.11ac devices, and half the ones i've come across use minipcie with non-standard form-factor and pinout
<Namidairo> oh dear that cpu
<Namidairo> kirkwooooood
<neggles> yeah
<neggles> there's definitely that issue :P
<Namidairo> I remember that they had a little bit of logspam from their ethernet driver
<neggles> look at this absolutely cursed monstrosity of a 4x4:4 802.11ac dual band AP "miniPCIe card" https://i.imgur.com/hirON1R.jpg
<Namidairo> ah they don't have a mv643xx on this one
<neggles> correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm *pretty* sure running two independent PCIe x1 interfaces over one miniPCIe slot is Very Illegal
<Namidairo> that's why only one is plugged in
<Namidairo> like you could manage to mount anything without a riser cable on that second one anyway
<neggles> oh no, that gigantic angry card in the middle has two PCIe x1 interfaces with their own separate REFCLK/TX/RX pairs, one going to each radio
<neggles> the regular-looking card on the right is a listen-only scan radio
<neggles> (which uses the same 4x4:4 802.11ac wave-2 radio chip, but with a single-chain RX-only frontend, because, y'know, that's cost-effective)
<Namidairo> yeah this was the cursed unit
<neggles> yuh
<neggles> that bluetooth antenna is second only to an old ruckus zoneflex 3x3 802.11n AP I was given, which has a nineteen-element 3D active antenna
<neggles> the 802.11n era was wild
<neggles> now it's all software :(
<slh> yeah, but sadly 802.11ac and 802.11ax are really much faster, while 802.11n didn't really improve 802.11g all that much (especially not the earlier designs)
<hurricos> I mean @slh
<Namidairo> apart from the whole no 11ac in 2.4ghz
<hurricos> you can get practically 350mbit/s
<slh> correct
<hurricos> with 11n
<slh> with 802.11ax, 2.4 GHz gets another boost though
<neggles> g/a are realistically 10-20ish mbps, I found 11n was realistically 100ish mbps in a 20mhz channel
<Namidairo> just uhh, ignore those old clients
<neggles> (when you have other clients sharing and non-perfect signal)
<neggles> yeaaaah the main benefits of AX in 2.4GHz are the power saving stuff for upcoming IoT devices
<neggles> 2.4GHz is a lost cause at this point :P
<Namidairo> it might be a while until people switch over to the esp32-c6
<neggles> especially since i wouldn't expect to see modules etc. actually be available till probably Q3
<neggles> it'll be a long while 'till we're rid of 2.4GHz 11n clients
srslypascal has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<slh> if only the IoT stuff (including the esp8266/ esp8285) could do WPA3...
<neggles> ESP32-C3 can!
<slh> yes, but commercial stuff still comes with esp8285
<neggles> tuya are moving to the C3 and a few other manufacturers' SoCs
<neggles> and they're going to be the main driver
<slh> that would indeed be an improvement (not so much the other SOCs, though)
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
cyrozap has quit [Server closed connection]
cyrozap has joined #openwrt-devel
clandmeter has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
clandmeter has joined #openwrt-devel
clandmeter has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kb1sph has joined #openwrt-devel
valku has quit [Quit: valku]
lmore377 has quit [Server closed connection]
lmore377 has joined #openwrt-devel
kb1sph has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
kb1sph has joined #openwrt-devel
Ultrasauce has quit [Server closed connection]
sauce has joined #openwrt-devel
GNUmoon has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
srslypascal is now known as Guest115
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
srslypascal is now known as Guest116
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest115 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
kb1sph has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
srslypascal is now known as Guest117
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
kb1sph has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest116 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
GNUmoon has joined #openwrt-devel
srslypascal is now known as Guest118
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
GNUmoon has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Guest117 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
srslypascal is now known as Guest120
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
GNUmoon has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest118 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
kb1sph-m has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest120 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
kb1sph-m has left #openwrt-devel [Leaving]
lmore377 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
lmore377_ has joined #openwrt-devel
lmore377 has joined #openwrt-devel
lmore377_ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
valku has joined #openwrt-devel
valku has quit []
Slimey has quit [Server closed connection]
Slimey has joined #openwrt-devel
lmore377 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
lmore377 has joined #openwrt-devel
<neggles> is there a way to rename the `kernel` volume inside the image that ubinize-image.sh generates? looks like it's hardcoded
ecloud has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
GNUmoon has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
ecloud has joined #openwrt-devel
GNUmoon has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
dlg has joined #openwrt-devel
<owrt-snap-builds> Build [#452](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/6/builds/452) of `lantiq/xway` completed successfully.
rua has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit []
srslypascal is now known as Guest132
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
<owrt-snap-builds> Build [#463](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/7/builds/463) of `armvirt/32` completed successfully.
Guest132 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
eigma has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
johnf has joined #openwrt-devel
<owrt-snap-builds> Build [#506](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/1/builds/506) of `ath79/generic` completed successfully.
hanetzer has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
hurricos has quit [Server closed connection]
hurricos has joined #openwrt-devel
clandmeter has joined #openwrt-devel
pmelange has joined #openwrt-devel
pmelange has left #openwrt-devel [#openwrt-devel]
awgh has joined #openwrt-devel
floof58_ has joined #openwrt-devel
floof58_ has quit []
floof58_ has joined #openwrt-devel
guidosarducci has joined #openwrt-devel
paper_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
Grommish has joined #openwrt-devel
hgl has joined #openwrt-devel
Grommish has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
Grommish has joined #openwrt-devel
pmelange has joined #openwrt-devel
pmelange has left #openwrt-devel [#openwrt-devel]
aiyion has joined #openwrt-devel
aiyion has quit []
aiyion has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
dwfreed has joined #openwrt-devel
Acinonyx has joined #openwrt-devel
dangole has joined #openwrt-devel
Acinonyx_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Acinonyx has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Lechu has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
GNUmoon has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
GNUmoon has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
dangole has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Acinonyx has joined #openwrt-devel
Acinonyx_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
owrt-2102-builds has joined #openwrt-devel
owrt-1907-builds has joined #openwrt-devel
owrt-snap-builds has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper1 has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
danitool has quit [Quit: Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos]
rua1 has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
isak has joined #openwrt-devel
mattytap has joined #openwrt-devel
<owrt-snap-builds> Build [#425](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/22/builds/425) of `ipq40xx/generic` completed successfully.
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper1 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
gladiac is now known as Guest162
gladiac has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest162 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Borromini has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
pmelange has joined #openwrt-devel
pmelange has left #openwrt-devel [#openwrt-devel]
pmelange has joined #openwrt-devel
pmelange has left #openwrt-devel [#openwrt-devel]
pmelange has joined #openwrt-devel
pmelange has left #openwrt-devel [#openwrt-devel]
ecloud has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
ecloud has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
srslypascal has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
<Grommish> stintel: ping
pmelange has joined #openwrt-devel
pmelange has left #openwrt-devel [#openwrt-devel]
rua1 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Lechu has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<stintel> Grommish: pon
<stintel> g
minimal has joined #openwrt-devel
shorty has joined #openwrt-devel
shorty has quit []
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
ldir has joined #openwrt-devel
ldir has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
ldir has joined #openwrt-devel
ldir has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
ldir has joined #openwrt-devel
dangole has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
<hurricos> Namidairo: May I submit one more thing RE: 11n hardware in 2022
<hurricos> Nothing, and I mean nothing, beats ath9k reliability
<hurricos> I've just discovered one of my APs has been down for days because the wave2 ath10k-ct-htt firmware crashed
ldir has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
zarzarzar has joined #openwrt-devel
<hurricos> I've just discovered one of my APs has been down for days because the wave2 ath10k-ct-htt firmware crashed
<hurricos> err
<hurricos> .... I meant to up-ret on another terminal. Sorry.
ldir has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
ldir has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
ldir has joined #openwrt-devel
kenny has joined #openwrt-devel
valku has joined #openwrt-devel
valku has quit []
ldir has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
ldir has joined #openwrt-devel
ldir has quit []
Borromini has quit [Quit: leaving]
srslypascal has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
Luke-Jr has joined #openwrt-devel
srslypascal has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
openwrter has joined #openwrt-devel
<openwrter> hi! I just found out today that the DecoM5 does use openwrt after all, but needs to be compiled, etc. I've seen some people on the forum sending a pre compiled binary. Is there anyone online with that file? Please?
<openwrter> I've only compiled some simple things within linux (Rpi and/or amd64) but never inside a router. Is this even possible for a non-programmer mortal?
<Habbie> hello
<openwrter> The DecoM5 is a TPLink product. Was usually happy eith their products, but whern I learned these things *had to be used* as a router and within a smartphone app I thought "na, there's got to be a linux way"
<Habbie> i am a programmer, so i'm biased, but i don't think building your own openwrt images (given support for your platform is present etc.) is hard
<Habbie> have you ever, perhaps, compiled a linux kernel?
<openwrter> yes
<Habbie> used make menuconfig?
<openwrter> yes
<Habbie> you're ready
<Habbie> :)
<openwrter> I did it many years ago though, I'm too spoiled by Debian now
<openwrter> apt-get
<Habbie> reserve 20GB of diskspace, clone the openwrt repo, run make menuconfig
<openwrter> et al
<Habbie> sure, same here
<openwrter> where should I do this, if inside of a amd64 system, will a .bin compatible file be generated in the end? Also, I have no idea of what's inside (I don-t think I can answer the questions) like when building a kernel for a PC you built yourself or can ask via lsusb or lspci or whatever...
<Habbie> i see
<Habbie> i see no mention of decom5 in the openwrt git tree
<Habbie> amd64 is not a problem, you pick your target in menuconfig and the right things will happen
<openwrter> can i post a link?
<Habbie> however, usually what you pick is a router that's already in that list
<Habbie> yes
<Habbie> so that person has made their changes public but they're not upstream in openwrt yet
<openwrter> so i clone that repo and jam?
<Habbie> maybe
<Habbie> i did not read the full thread
<Habbie> i assume you did
<openwrter> I don't understand enough, I just understood sent you the compiled file... Sorry
<Habbie> ok so
<Habbie> normally people would clone the openwrt repo, pick their router (in make menuconfig), type make, images come out
<openwrter> OK, I'll try to understand and proceed as suggested with the cloning and make, etc
<Habbie> in this case, the openwrt repo does not (yet?) support the deco-m5
<Habbie> but that person's fork does
<Habbie> i don't know how well - i trust reading that entire conversation will make that clear
<Habbie> so yes, clone it, make menuconfig, make, might do the trick
<openwrter> sounds as if it-s running quite well
<Habbie> i see some caveats about wifi drivers at the start but maybe that's fixed further down
<openwrter> worth a try. Thank you for your time Habbie
<Habbie> you're welcome
<stintel> Grommish: no idea man :(
<Habbie> stintel, did you have some tplink deco stuff?
<stintel> nope
<Grommish> stintel: Worth a shot :D heh Thx!
<openwrter> Habbie, sorry to bother. Tried to clone https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/compare/master...bdherouville:master --- Fatal not found
<Habbie> it would be github.com/bdherouville/openwrt
<openwrter> so far so good, thanks
Spr0cket- has quit [Server closed connection]
Spr0cket has joined #openwrt-devel
<openwrter> Hi! When running make menuconfig it complains about libpam missing, APT installed this one "Note, selecting 'libpam0g-dev' instead of 'libpam-dev'" How can I tell the make to use 'libpam0g-dev' instead of 'libpam-dev' ??
<Habbie> is menuconfig refusing to run, or just complaining a bit?
<openwrter> just complaining
<Habbie> try ignoring it for now :)
minimal has quit []
<openwrter> just going with defaults, you think that will work?
<openwrter> make is running
<Habbie> did you pick the deco m5 target?
<openwrter> it said atheros something
<Habbie> then no
<openwrter> Target system? Deco N/A
<Habbie> ah
<Habbie> then yes
<Habbie> although i'd expect m5 there
<openwrter> ATHEROS ATH79 was the sone selected by default
<openwrter> I'll see if I can find the chipset soimewhere in the web
<Habbie> i think you want to pick Qualcomm Atheros IPQ40XX there
<Habbie> and then pick your deco in Target Profile
<openwrter> OK, says V2, I've got V3, but let's try anyway
<Habbie> right, indeed bdherouville's work mentions v2