<stintel>
also with 160MHz there is a huge potential for interference with nearby BSSIDs in the 5GHz band, you might just not be able to get enough airtime
<russell-->
my macbook air m1 says it does 2 spatial streams, maxes out at 1200Mbps phy data rate, which naturally won't be the same as actual throughput
<stintel>
russell--: but you're probably on 80MHz channel width
<Edu4rdSHL>
stintel, already tested on another channels too
<russell-->
yes
<russell-->
not to mention, ISPs lie
<russell-->
and the internet is a crazy place
<Edu4rdSHL>
I mean, I work for ISP where the problem is at :p
<russell-->
there you go!
<stintel>
doesn't matter
<stintel>
do an iperf to a local endpoint first
<Edu4rdSHL>
I just wish wireless doesn't exists at this point, wired everything just works :p
<Edu4rdSHL>
Yeah, stintel, doing it now
<russell-->
totally
<russell-->
"the more you deal with wireless, the more you appreciate wires" --me
<Edu4rdSHL>
Tbh I don't get why the f* sales promised wireless speeds when me as technical leader of the ISP said that we should only promise wired speeds
<Edu4rdSHL>
But well
<stintel>
also if you expect to have 2.5Gbps, then yes, pull a wire :P
<Edu4rdSHL>
Here we are
<stintel>
also which device are you talking about?
<stintel>
because if it's really mt7915e, this could be mt7621 based and then you can forget about it
<Edu4rdSHL>
stintel, it's a mt7981-based board
<stintel>
to be honest I haven't done any performance testing on filogic
<stintel>
on Unifi 6LR (mediatek/mt7622) I've seen ~1.2Gbps on 80MHz channel width
<stintel>
don't think I ever tried 160MHz because it's simply not a good idea if you have neighbors with 5GHz networks
<russell-->
wrap house in foil
<stintel>
haha yeah might also help with DFS :P
<Edu4rdSHL>
stintel, I know, the thing is not 160MHz, just all channels. On iperf I'm getting the same speed as from speedtest.net, which kinda sucks tho
<enyc>
I just wonder if their bugreport should have a quick summary at the top; there is a lot in there. Not clear if already fixed in master, etc
Sawzall has joined #openwrt-devel
<Habbie>
what is 2f66 supposed to mean?
<Habbie>
oh i'll ask over there
<Habbie>
oh they left
Daanct12 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
rsalvaterra has quit []
rsalvaterra has joined #openwrt-devel
<enyc>
Habbie: comment on their erport? I like that they really tried with good report ...
<Habbie>
will do
<Habbie>
i don't have/understand all context, but I do know DNS
<Habbie>
and 2f66 is not sensible TXT or HINFO content
<enyc>
Habbie: I know much on DNS but do not know about HINFO nor quite understand their erport myself; and alas I have other IRL outside tasks to be doing!
<Habbie>
:)
Daanct12 has joined #openwrt-devel
ptudor_ has joined #openwrt-devel
ptudor has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
valku has joined #openwrt-devel
hgl has joined #openwrt-devel
MAbeeTT2 has joined #openwrt-devel
Daanct12 has quit [Quit: WeeChat 4.6.0]
MAbeeTT has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
n3ph has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
gromero has joined #openwrt-devel
kenny has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
hgl_ has joined #openwrt-devel
hgl has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
kenny has joined #openwrt-devel
n3ph has joined #openwrt-devel
n3ph has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
n3ph has joined #openwrt-devel
n3ph has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
christophe0o has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
linusw has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jbowen has quit [Write error: connection closed]
norris has quit [Read error: No route to host]
arnd has quit [Read error: No route to host]
lvrp16_ has quit [Read error: No route to host]
lvrp16_ has joined #openwrt-devel
linusw has joined #openwrt-devel
norris has joined #openwrt-devel
arnd has joined #openwrt-devel
christophe0o has joined #openwrt-devel
hgl_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
jbowen has joined #openwrt-devel
hgl has joined #openwrt-devel
aiyion_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]