22:12 <jstultz> bamse: just a heads up, seeing an audio regression w/ linus' HEAD

22:12 <jstultz> bamse: working to bisect down the merge that caused it

22:20 <bamse> jstultz: thanks, wanna trade my i dead pointer dereference in msm_ioctl_gem_submit() after ~30 minutes of wayland usage?

22:20 <jstultz> bamse: nope :)

22:20 <jstultz> bamse: just happy to let you know :)

22:21 <bamse> jstultz: :)

22:21 <bamse> jstultz: i intend to see if i can debug it after the looming deadline...

22:22 <bamse> jstultz: it's in last weeks linux-next, so it's likely to show up in -rc1, in case you're hitting it

22:22 <jstultz> bamse: appreciate the warning

22:46 <jstultz> bamse: just fyi, it looks like the audio regression somehow came in on the networking merge? seems like an odd one, but i'm seeing a lot of remoteproc errors, so maybe that isn't so crazy

22:46 <jstultz> bamse: "qcom_smd_qrtr remoteproc-adsp:glink-edge.IPCRTR.-1.-1: invalid ipcrouter packet"

22:55 <bamse> jstultz: ugh, haven't seen that yet...but i've seen some security fixes flowing by

22:56 <bamse> jstultz: there's a couple of changes in qrtr_endpoint_post() to validate the incoming message

22:56 <bamse> jstultz: if you get that warning it means those checks rejected the message

22:57 <jstultz> bamse: i'll bisect it down a bit further.. that may be an error long after the real issue hit

22:57 <jstultz> just letting you know in case others bring it up

23:50 <jstultz> bamse: bisected down to commit aaa8e4922c88 "net: qrtr: make checks in qrtr_endpoint_post() stricter"

23:50 <bamse> jstultz: as i said ;)

23:50 <jstultz> bamse: will report it later, got to run right now.

23:51 <bamse> jstultz: there was another patch on the same check end of last week...

23:52 <bamse> jstultz: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20210830083717.GU7722@kadam/

23:52 <bamse> jstultz: i presume that hasn't trickled into torvalds' tree yet...but worth seeing if that addresses the problem before reporting it

23:53 <jstultz> sorry, that looks like the same as the problematic change

23:53 <jstultz> bamse: ^

23:54 <bamse> jstultz: hmm, you're right...i figured you hit the fix that landed last week...not the one making it even stricter

23:55 <bamse> jstultz: i guess it would be useful to get some insight into what the rejected length(s) is(are)