<lumag>
so I hoped that you might remember the reason for that
<robclark>
not sure where I got that.. either docs or looking at downstream.. but it could be they were too lazy to reduce the # of mixers for "cost optimized" versions of the display controller block
<robclark>
err, mixer stages
<lumag>
ok, probably we should just test if it's possible to use higher mixer stages
<lumag>
because the TRM i have here mentions base + stage0-4