08:09 <djakov> aka_[m]: looks like a fix?

16:32 <robclark> sboyd: btw, saw this crash..

16:32 <robclark> https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/4X7eEERc/

16:44 <robclark> sboyd: oh, this might be something in steev's x13s kernel not play nicely

16:51 <robclark> steev: didn't look close enough to see if this is a good fix.. but this is a fix:

16:51 <robclark> https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/pumX361G/

16:51 <steev> robclark: yeah, i think that stuff is part of abelvesa's syncstate patchset

16:52 <robclark> ok.. possible something didn't get added for sc7280?

16:53 <steev> it's possible it wasn't tested on 7280, as i believe the focus was 8280

16:53 <steev> i don't have any 7280 devices here, only 845, 8180x and 8280xp

16:54 <robclark> not sure if there are a lot of 7280 things in the wild.. saw something about a samsung (?) laptop

16:54 <robclark> https://www.sammobile.com/news/galaxy-book-2-go-launched-snapdragon-7c-gen-3-processor/

16:54 <steev> why are you using the rc7?

16:55 <steev> but regardless, the patchset probably hasn't been updated between then and 6.3.5

16:55 <robclark> didn't look like you had 6.3 final

16:55 <steev> it's linux-6.3.y

16:55 <robclark> ahh

16:55 <steev> the linux-x.z.y are the stable trees

16:56 <steev> but it'll probably still have the issue

16:57 <robclark> well, wtvr, don't really want to switch kernel until I can get to point of building my own kernel on the laptop

16:59 <steev> yeah, that makes sense :)

17:19 <steev> robclark: shouldn't line 22 of that diff be if (!scs) ?

17:25 <steev> oh, yeah, the rc doesn't have the newest version of the patchset it looks like

18:22 <minecrell> lumag: It might be better to push the db410c wcnss firmware from r1034.2.1 to linux-firmware. For some reason the wcnss firmware in r1036.1 is actually a few months older than the one in r1034.2.1. Not sure if anyone knows what's different in those...

19:06 <lumag> minecrell, ugh. I'll see if we can get any info/suggestions

19:08 <minecrell> lumag: thanks! and good luck I guess 😅

19:09 <lumag> :-D

19:26 <minecrell> lumag: It would also be nice if qcom could provide a new version, since they published several security issues for wcnss since then. But I kind of doubt that is going to happen...