08:44 <z3ntu> Hi bamse , how aggressive should one be in grouping functions in pinctrl? In https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210723192352.546902-3-iskren.chernev@gmail.com/ I still see qup*, uim*, wlan1_adc*, ddr_pxi* functions (and probably more) that could be grouped

10:20 <DavidHeidelberg[m]> bamse hey, do u have some pattern for vim or something for stuff like that "clk: qcom: gcc-sdm660: Replace usage of parent_names" ?

14:19 <bamse> DavidHeidelberg[m]: no, i did some macro stuff along the way...but it was still done "manually" :/

14:20 <DavidHeidelberg[m]> okay, it's time to train AI to do this stuff :D

14:21 <bamse> z3ntu: somewhat agressive...i think it makes sense to have qupN as those are different functions

14:21 <bamse> z3ntu: had i done this one i probably would have squashed uimN_* into uimN...but i didn't find it necessary to ask for a respin

14:22 <bamse> z3ntu: the important ones are phase_flag and atest