13:13 <JIaxyga[m]> konradybcio: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca2c5b9c-6d8c-42a4-9f27-b60f024c95c2@linaro.org/

13:13 <JIaxyga[m]> Is /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) */ fine? Or better not only? Gpl2 is more lenient. I dont care tho

13:17 <konradybcio> actually, gpl2 is fine.. I had mistook this for bindings which we want to be dual-licensed

14:13 <JIaxyga[m]> <konradybcio> "actually, gpl2 is fine.. I had..." <- btw maybe can I move it to the driver patch then

14:14 <JIaxyga[m]> I think this is more logical

16:34 <JIaxyga[m]> krzk: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d7a29931-9153-497e-9195-652666896a2c@linaro.org/

16:34 <JIaxyga[m]> Sorry, but I really dont understand what you're talking about. The warning was caused by duplicate compatible in qcom,rpmh.yaml. But the patch from the mailings doesnt even touch this file. There are no more warnings. The only thing I missed is the duplicate interconnect-cells from qcom,rpmh-common.yaml, but it does not cause warnings (I will fix this in the second version). Please be more specific to make it clearer

16:36 <krzk> JIaxyga[m]: don't you have still duplicate compatibles?

16:36 <krzk> I think I grepped for them and found them...

16:46 <JIaxyga[m]> <krzk> "JIaxyga: don't you have still..." <- https://imgur.com/a/hhOkqK0

16:46 <JIaxyga[m]> The first from properties, the second from examples and the third with the driver itself

16:47 <JIaxyga[m]> grep on patches of the first version

16:50 <krzk> then I am confused why there were duplicated last time

16:51 <krzk> ah, you added them in two places?

16:51 <krzk> then code looks fine

17:15 <JIaxyga[m]> <krzk> "then code looks fine" <- but I still drop: '#interconnect-cells': true, right?