ChanServ changed the topic of #linux-msm to:
marvin24_ has joined #linux-msm
marvin24 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
jhovold has quit [Quit: WeeChat 4.1.2]
<z3ntu> krzk: For https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/bbe3bc57-1d5e-42d4-b860-15a27c7c57bd@linaro.org/ would the solution be that we drop the string "qcom,hfpll" completely? So just have e.g. "qcom,qcs404-hfpll" in driver+bindings+dts?
danylo has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
danylo has joined #linux-msm
svarbanov has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
svarbanov has joined #linux-msm
<mal> bryanodonoghue: is there some rule in which order the interrupts should be in documentation, for example in case of camss, I noticed in most cases those are ordered by name but for example here https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240111-linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v4-2-cdd5c57ff1dc@linaro.org/ those are ordered based in the interrupt number
<mal> in my opinion the order in that patch in not very readable as it needs more work to find out how many of each name there is