<lanik123[m]>
hacker420[m]: Probably not at all, it depends on how phone PM part is made
<hacker420[m]>
would schematics help anything here
<lanik123[m]>
No, you already know that you cannot get working bl without regulators xd
<hacker420[m]>
lol
<hacker420[m]>
so guess I wait until you figure out why the probe gets deferred on enabled regulators
<hacker420[m]>
maybe it's the same thing as 8916
<hacker420[m]>
where you need wcnss up
<lanik123[m]>
hacker420[m]: I can try to find solution in msm8953 or msm8916 mainline rep. I don't think we're the first who faced this problem.
<hacker420[m]>
> Note: Due to weird dependencies issues in the DRM MSM driver, you need to make WiFi/Bluetooth work to have the DRM MSM driver finish loading successfully. (WCNSS takes a while to load, so it will trigger attempting to probe DRM MSM again after it fails to load on its own due to dependencies issues between the DRM driver and the panel driver...)
<lanik123[m]>
hacker420[m]: lol what
<hacker420[m]>
lanik123[m]: ask qualcomm
<travmurav[m]>
^ is not an issue if you explicitly load modules in order: panel, msm
<hacker420[m]>
hm what if I have both built in
<travmurav[m]>
tough luck /s
<hacker420[m]>
do I switch them to modules then
<travmurav[m]>
i think there is a bootparam to extend the deferral timeout
<hacker420[m]>
might test that
<travmurav[m]>
coudl try that
<travmurav[m]>
deferred_probe_timeout=30 I htink
<hacker420[m]>
yes
<lanik123[m]>
lanik123[m]: As I remember it was wled driver have deferred probe before drm
<travmurav[m]>
travmurav[m]: though the default for this seems to have a long story of being changed around so who knows...
<barni2000[m]>
why ramoops using the same adress like watchdog?
<hacker420[m]>
because it has the same address afaik
<barni2000[m]>
strang
<barni2000[m]>
* strange
<barni2000[m]>
what happens if you only keep the removed-dma-pools ranges from msm8937.dtsi the reserved-memory part in downstream cedric dt is strange for me a bit