00:17 <CN_SZTL> Hello, any chance to get my PR https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/12346 reviewed? Thanks.

03:08 <owrt-snap-builds> Build [#849](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/52/builds/849) of `x86/legacy` failed.

07:40 <KGB-2> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_kirkwood.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 99.9% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)

08:53 <owrt-snap-builds> Build [#857](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/54/builds/857) of `ramips/mt7620` failed.

12:51 <aiyion> The Google WiFi (Gale) is a pretty decent dualband device with a nice looking formfactor. I prepared a backport of norris' work and a few weeks ago to 22.03 and am testing it since. Even though the backport is well isolated, I feel like it beeing 10 commits might make it unapproachable for reviewers. IS there anybody I could interest in taking a look at ipq40xx-chromium?

12:52 <aiyion> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openwrt/list/?series=349989

13:05 <owrt-snap-builds> Build [#88](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/81/builds/88) of `ipq807x/generic` completed successfully.

13:12 <enyc> I wonder if 23.xx will be DSA on all targets.

15:23 <robimarko> aiyion: Honestly, I am not a big fan of backporting a subtarget to 22.03

15:24 <f00b4r0>

15:24 <f00b4r0> ^. Pretty sure it'll get NACKd

15:28 <aiyion> robimarko: Because it means more work than just a regular backport? I had hoped it would make things easier to get this backported; as it unlikely to affect other devices at all?

15:28 <aiyion> *as it's

15:30 <robimarko> aiyion: Look at it this way, what is the point of a stable release if everything from master is going to get backported?

15:30 <robimarko> Bugfixes are one thing, but we are talking about a whole new subtarget

15:31 <aiyion> I thought about master as bleeding edge development and stable to contain older (possibly better tested) commits

15:32 <robimarko> Yeah, cause eventually master will get branched off and become the new stable after some stabilization

15:33 <robimarko> I would also argue that since that is supposed to happen soon-ish what is the purpose of backporting a subtarget to 22.03

15:35 <aiyion> I assumed it does not harm the work of others, the work is already done and OpenWrt could support the device earlier, but it feels like I'm overlooking a bigger effort to integrate it?

16:16 <G10h4ck> PaulFertser I have followed your suggestion about appling all teh patches to my sourc etree and then work on top of those

16:16 <G10h4ck> but now I am getting another unexpected error :-/

16:17 <G10h4ck> that is probably because some extra files are shippe din the src dir

16:22 <PaulFertser> G10h4ck: yes, OpenWrt build system not only applies patches but can copy some files too.

16:23 <G10h4ck> ATM I have included those in my source tree

16:23 <G10h4ck> I hope it will not cause much trouble when distilling the interesting changes for submission

17:23 <enyc> aiyion: probably better (imho) if you can help out sorting out any 23.xx blockers, https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/10672 ?? update -- apparently " Ansuel> enyc once we have every target to 5.15 in theory we should be ready to fork" "< hauke> enyc: the lantiq target should also go to kernel 5.15" ... then there will start being 23.0x-SNAPSHOT images available etc..

17:26 <enyc> What would be useful in testing Lantiq switch etc, btw ??

18:07 <Ansuel> hauke anything i can do with helping for the lantiq target?

19:30 <oliv3r[m]> What's the timeline for having experimental 6.x support?

19:47 <Borromini> oliv3r[m]: once all targets are on 5.15 and 23.xx gets branched

23:35 <hurricos> neggles: big, cheap 10G switches -- know of any that use fabrics that have full switchdev support? Is it exclusively Prestera stuff?

23:36 <hurricos> I say "switches", but I mean with l3 / VRF support. My objective is a 10G lab that's fully open, i.e. will work if I set up networking on them with something I dump out of netpen.io :p

23:38 <hurricos> I read https://netdevconf.info/0x15/slides/34/04_switchdev_the_good_and_the_ugly_zubkov.pdf and it hit me that OpenWrt isn't the best for "big" networking applications