<ajax>
there's an MR for swapchain_m1 i thought. still too new to require?
<zmike>
yes
<zmike>
I'll add it as optional use during 23.1 cycle and require for 23.2
<zmike>
or something like that
avane has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<ajax>
i feel like i'm missing something. what's hard about destroying them?
<zmike>
knowing when they're no longer in use
<ajax>
you can't seriously need to wait for all the images to go idle, that's madness
<ajax>
they're not yours, you're just holding a reference
<ajax>
that's why you asked the wsi to allocate them
<zmike>
I'm not super confident that's how all implementations see it
<ajax>
blah
<ajax>
fine, rb
avane has joined #zink
<anholt>
there's a longstanding validation error about VK objects not being destroyed by vkDestroyDevice time -- any clues on that one? Unfortunately the zink built-in validation layer stuff is not a great help for it, since we tear down validation reporting before vkDestroyDevice.
<zmike>
uhhh
<zmike>
there's some cases where gallium objects don't get destroyed?
<zmike>
I've debugged a few of them and there's nothing to be done on the zink side
<zmike>
but I haven't done much validation stomping outside of ZINK_DEBUG
<zmike>
if you file a test case I can put it at the top of my list for tomorrow