00:36 <rotanid> hi! is it intentional, that the pkgdata pages still link to 22.03 package sources? e.g. https://openwrt.org/packages/pkgdata/wpad

02:56 <dwfreed> probably just nobody has run the script to update the pkgdata in the wiki

06:55 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#364](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/182/builds/364) of `master_bmips/bcm6318` failed.

09:49 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#358](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/157/builds/358) of `master_mvebu/cortexa72` failed.

10:57 <KGB-2> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_bcm47xx.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 100.0% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)

11:08 <robimarko> Ansuel: Buildbots still seem to hit some concurrency issues with per device initramfs

11:17 <\x> robimarko: damn 2.12 fw still not hitting quic repo

11:18 <\x> its like a month now or so

11:18 <robimarko> For QCA a month is nothing

11:20 <\x> stable af but yeah i dont think it can be used yet on openwrt if they arent pushing it :D

11:58 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#351](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/149/builds/351) of `master_mediatek/filogic` failed.

15:13 <mrkiko> Regarding PR 16359 (dnsmasq TC bits in query handling: do we prefer this to be submitted upstream first and then backported in general? I don't know if this is the case already

15:14 <mrkiko> seems not

15:21 <mrkiko> Ansuel: hello! long time no hear. Hoping all is well. Wondeginf what are the roaxblocks for merning the fan support for nbg7815. I already asked, so it may be you already answered and I lost youranswers - sorry in that case.

15:22 <slh> that's the kind of patch I personally wouldn't touch without upstream ack, if only to ensure that it actually gets reported and fixed upstream. dnsmasq isn't a random project after all, and highly security (and standards-) sensitive

15:27 <slh> mrkiko: you did notice http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-September/043144.html ?

15:38 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#365](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/205/builds/365) of `master_mpc85xx/p1020` completed successfully.

15:56 <mrkiko> slh: I did, thanks for point it out anyway :)

19:30 <stintel> initial test of chachapoly on a Power8 not running OpenWrt shows the same issue with the algo not being registered in /proc/crypto, tested on 5.15 kernel

22:25 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#358](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/115/builds/358) of `master_x86/64` failed.

23:29 <KGB-0> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_omap.html has been updated. (11.1% images and 100.0% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)