<anholt>
I think gl46 cts is actually inefficient enough that we'd probably be better off testing gles + some subset of piglit pre-merge and kicking gl cts and full piglit to post.
<anholt>
(in terms of catching useful bugs)
<zmike>
hmm not sure I'm okay with that; there's a lot of cases where 46 has caught bugs
<zmike>
GL WG is looking to spend some resources on cts in the near future, so maybe we should try to pinpoint the long tests
<anholt>
yeah. just fixing the tests would be great.
<anholt>
thanks for noticing. I actually have no idea how khronos process works
<anholt>
(other than "poorly"
<zmike>
cc Sachiel
<zmike>
I think I usually just click mark as active and then add the opengl reviewers
<zmike>
can't remember if I need something else
<zmike>
(click "add reviewer" on the left, type in "openglcts-review" and send)
<anholt>
thanks!
<Sachiel>
yeah, you need to mark them active at least. The reviewers can get added by the cts chair if you don't feel like it/forget to do it. For extra points, add the 'opengl-review' tag
hch12907 has quit []
neobrain[m] has quit []
jhli_ has quit []
jhli has joined #zink
kchibisov has joined #zink
<kchibisov>
Is the stuff like eglSwapBuffersWithDamage in scope for zink, given that it's basically a wsi thing?