xutaxkamay has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
xutaxkamay has joined #openwrt-devel
bluew has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
bluew has joined #openwrt-devel
bluew has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
bluew has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Quit: Tapper]
Harm_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
minimal has quit [Quit: Leaving]
csrf has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
csrf has joined #openwrt-devel
csrf has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
csrf has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
MAbeeTT3 has joined #openwrt-devel
Harm_ has joined #openwrt-devel
MAbeeTT2 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
clayface_ has joined #openwrt-devel
clayface has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
floof58 is now known as Guest415
floof58 has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest415 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
torv has quit [Quit: torv]
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has quit [Quit: Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos]
hanetzer has joined #openwrt-devel
hanetzer4 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<Mangix> let's see if this thing survives a kernel update
Mangix has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
hanetzer1 has joined #openwrt-devel
hanetzer has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Mangix has joined #openwrt-devel
Mangix has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
Mangix has joined #openwrt-devel
valku has quit [Quit: valku]
srslypascal has quit [Quit: Leaving]
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
guidosarducci has joined #openwrt-devel
guidosarducci_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
guidosarducci_ has joined #openwrt-devel
guidosarducci has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<KGB-1> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_tegra.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 99.6% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
<Znevna> erm
<Znevna> I've found an interesting issue
<Znevna> I have to test it first though to see if that realy is the cause
<Znevna> nope that's not it >.>
<Znevna> so isn't the label supposed to be redundant in the new led definitions in dts file?
<Znevna> since it's combined in luci from color_id and function
mcbridematt has joined #openwrt-devel
Mathew has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
GNUmoon has quit [Quit: Leaving]
GNUmoon has joined #openwrt-devel
csrf has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Guest361 is now known as ynezz
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
csrf has joined #openwrt-devel
<owrt-2203-builds> Build [#190](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/openwrt-22.03/images/#builders/11/builds/190) of `at91/sama5` completed successfully.
csrf has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
linusw has joined #openwrt-devel
MaxSoniX has joined #openwrt-devel
<karlp> Znevna:from upstream,yeah, if you have colour and function you can/should drop label.
<karlp> also, annoyingly, if you have a color _or_ a function, you get a lame name there, and node name is ignored as well as label,
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
zer0def has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<Znevna> well
<Znevna> if I don't add the label, the led no worky
<Znevna> (you have to add it in luci, then it works)
<karlp> "no worky" meaning what?
<Znevna> it doesn't do anything by default
<Znevna> doesn't light at boot, doesn't blink at upgrade(?)
<Znevna> it doesn't do anything :
<Znevna> if I add the label, it works
<karlp> label, colour, function are all just mangled to end up with sysfs filenames.
<karlp> somethign _else_ has an assumption on the led "name" but it's not unreasonable that you would need to change these together.
<Znevna> well I don't know how to dig deeper in this, I've tried last night to make the wifi leds work and I'm calling it quits
zer0def has joined #openwrt-devel
robimarko has joined #openwrt-devel
MaxSoniX has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
MaxSoniX has joined #openwrt-devel
embargo has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<aiyion> arinc does not read here, does he?
<robimarko> nbd: You plan to push 6.1 backports instead of 5.15 ones or that is just for your use?
<nbd> i'd like to push it eventually, but i guess it needs more testing
<nbd> i'm only testing mt76 myself at the moment
<robimarko> master seems like a great place for that
<robimarko> I can tell you that ath11k works fine, better than with 300 backports
<nbd> great
<nbd> i will update it in the next few days and push it to master
<robimarko> Awesome
MaxS0niX has joined #openwrt-devel
<\x> is this something new?
<\x> Wed Nov 30 18:10:14 2022 daemon.debug hostapd: phy5g-lan: STA e0:d4:e8:XX:XX:XX IEEE 802.11: start SAE authentication (RX commit, status=126 (SAE_HASH_TO_ELEMENT))
<\x> a windows laptop seems to be doing this
<stintel> that's just indicator of WPA3?
<\x> hash to element?
<\x> oh
<\x> nvm, googled it
<Znevna> any pointers on how can I make the wifi leds blink on this thing? x.x
<robimarko> Znevna: What HW?
<Znevna> rt-ax53u
<\x> stintel: started seeing it just today that I made SAE/FT-SAE on main lan and just made a dedicated AP for legacy stuff https://rimgo.bus-hit.me/a/7Azzm4l or yeah maybe I only noticed it now. seems a lot are FT-SAE capable
<robimarko> Znevna: What is the WLAN HW?
<Znevna> MT7915e
<robimarko> LED-s are connected to GPIO or?
<Znevna> I've tried all gpios, and no
<robimarko> Oh, so it could be connected to the radio
<robimarko> I have no experience with MTK radios and that unfortunately
<Znevna> we have this but I have no ideea on how to use it
MaxSoniX has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
<Znevna> I have to set CONFIG_MT76_LEDS=y somewhere? and the leds are somehow muxed to gpio 18 and 26
<stintel> interesting ... testing with CoDeL, iperf and iperf3 (UDP test with 2Gbps rate), notice that with iperf3 all packets bypass the qdisc (due to TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS and empty queue), but with iperf (v2), all packets enter the qdisc
<stintel> nbd: do you have an explanation for that?
<nbd> multiple parallel streams?
<nbd> or are you doing a single-stream test?
<stintel> nbd: no
<stintel> not using --parallel in either iperf
<nbd> what kind of system?
<stintel> OpenWrt on RPi4
<nbd> and what effective transmit rate does it reach on them?
embargo has joined #openwrt-devel
<stintel> nbd: iperf3 ~660Mbps, iperf2 ~500Mbps (from server report)
<stintel> ok but I think I see it
<stintel> I should look at the client (sender) rate
<stintel> with iperf3 this starts at ~800, then drops to ~600
<stintel> with iperf2 it claims 956Mbps
<stintel> which is enough to saturate the gigE link most likely
<stintel> hence queuing needs to happen
<stintel> so the "throttling" is just iperf3 saturating a full CPU core
<stintel> geez
<stintel> nbd: thanks, I feel dumb now
robimarko has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
robimarko has joined #openwrt-devel
embargo has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
dangole has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<dhewg> nbd: your 6.1-rc4 backport patch works just fine for me on mt7621 and ipq4019, at least I haven't noticed any regressions so far
<Borromini> dhewg: what MediaTek radios do you have?
dangole has joined #openwrt-devel
<dhewg> In use is the mt7515e on a wac124 and a mt7921u attached to the ipq4019
<Borromini> ok, ty
<dhewg> there's a 2g mt7603e too on the wac124, but I don't use that
<Borromini> :) I'm interested in MT7915.
<Znevna> :<
<dhewg> the 2g and 5g radio's are in use on the ipq, but those are non mt ofc
<Borromini> it should be pretty trivial to backport to 22.03 since it shares the same wireless stack with master atm, but i'd be running a complete FrankenWrt I guess
<Borromini> and I have ath9k/ath10k users as well, would be too messy. can't backport mac80211 per target/arch afaik :P
MaxSoniX has joined #openwrt-devel
<dhewg> erm, mt7615e on wac, not mt7515e ofc
MaxS0niX has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<dhewg> and interessted how? as in buying a device with 7915?
<Borromini> no i have a few running 22.03 (can't afford to switch those to master)
<Borromini> yes, i gathered that was a typo :)
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
G10h4ck has joined #openwrt-devel
embargo has joined #openwrt-devel
cbeznea has joined #openwrt-devel
MaxSoniX has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
MaxSoniX has joined #openwrt-devel
<\x> dhewg: how is your ipq4019 handling that mt radio? when I tried with an intel radio its like when I run iperf3 server on the ipq4019 itself, I can get 850Mbps+, but when I run iperf3 server on another host bridged to it, I get like 550Mbps. does the same thing happen with the MTK radio?
embargo has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
embargo has joined #openwrt-devel
torv has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
G10h4ck has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
minimal has joined #openwrt-devel
<dhewg> you mean the bitrate as reported by iperf3?
dangole has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Mangix has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<dhewg> because with a mt7921e connected to the mt7921u I do get "1200.9 Mbit/s, 80 MHz, HE-MCS 11, HE-NSS 2" rates, but iperf3 only gets ~200 MBits/sec
Mangix has joined #openwrt-devel
<dhewg> doesn't matter if to that router itself or to a bridged host
<dhewg> haven't looked into it yet why that is though, call me lazy
<dhewg> maybe because of me being lazy and using irqbalance :P
<\x> dhewg: yup, bench results on iperf3
<dhewg> nice, I wonder why it's such a big difference for me
<dhewg> will look into it some day, too many other things to do...
<\x> try it, run the iperf3 server right inside that ipq4019 AP
<\x> then iperf3 -R from a host connected to it
<\x> then try iperf3 server on something bridged to it via ethernet
<dhewg> what I did notice though, that this 7921<->7921 connection also get 40mhz rx and 80mhz tx
<dhewg> need to try that -R later though
<nick[m]12> hauke: is there some reference or simple steps explained to generate my own backports package for openwrt?
valku has joined #openwrt-devel
<nick[m]12> I tried to compile drivers with from the kernel directly (with 6.1 kerbek). However, I face so many issues.
<nick[m]12> So I thought about using the same commit hash to generate also a backport
<nick[m]12> And just use mac80211 package as normal
<karlp> nick[m]12: nbd has already gota 6.1 backports here: https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/nbd.git;a=commit;h=6f3cac77439b6b57e5f9e7cc4882dcac0e443822
<karlp> "nbd | i will update it in the next few days and push it to master"
<stintel> hmmmz, there's no CONFIG_ option to set the default LAN IP address?
<stintel> package/base-files/files/bin/config_generate: lan) ipad=${ipaddr:-"192.168.1.1"} ;;
<stintel> how can this $ipaddr be set to override the default?
<nick[m]12> karlp: already saw that, but I would be interested in how to generate that
MaxS0niX has joined #openwrt-devel
<Borromini> stintel: sure there is
MaxSoniX has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<Borromini> stintel: nevermind me, preinit yes, i have a UCI defaults snippet to change the OpenWrt IP.
tlj_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
tlj_ has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<dhewg> jow: can we have lib/ docs plz? :P
<dhewg> found readfile(fn, "line"), which is nice, but as libc getline() it includes \n, is that intended?
<dhewg> (and it's open(fn).read("line"))
<aiyion> Am I missing somehting, when old versions of my pathces are still visible in patchworks, even after the new reroll is shown?
<aiyion> Or is the workflow to just manually mark the old versions as superseded and put them in the archive?
<Borromini> aiyion: you can deprecate them yourself
<aiyion> thx
torv is now known as Guest457
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest457 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<Borromini> yw
torv is now known as Guest461
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest461 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
torv is now known as Guest462
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
Guest462 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
cbeznea has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rua has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
cbeznea has joined #openwrt-devel
torv has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
MaxSoniX has joined #openwrt-devel
MaxS0niX has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
srslypascal is now known as Guest470
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
<KGB-1> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_kirkwood.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 99.6% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
Guest470 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
minimal has quit [Quit: Leaving]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
MaxS0niX has joined #openwrt-devel
MaxSoniX has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
tlj has joined #openwrt-devel
tlj_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Mathew has joined #openwrt-devel
mcbridematt has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
schwicht has joined #openwrt-devel
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
goliath has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<hauke> nick[m]12: you can generate a backports release like this: ./gentree.py --refresh ~/linux/linux-next-clean/ ../backports-5.10.156-test1
<hauke> but it has to be adapted to the kernel
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
<aiyion> I don't get why these LEDs are all four lit up -.-' There is nothing, that should turn them on.
<aiyion> The rssi package is not installed, one of the leds is status, three rssi for 4G which the rssi package would not even support.
<aiyion> I marked two of them as active_high, two of them as active_low; one of them as default-state off. all four are on.
MaxS0niX has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
cbeznea has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<Znevna> x.x
<Znevna> what device?
<aiyion> the wavlink Router I'm trying to add support for :/
<aiyion> here's the diff:
<aiyion> I think it's fine for led_status to be permanently on, as its invoked by various aliases including led_running at the top of the dts.
<aiyion> Why the rssi LEDs are lit, I do not understand at all.
<aiyion> Setting triggers does not affect them either, apparently.
<aiyion> On is on, one is off, one is heartbeat.
<Znevna> those gpios seem oddly high
<Znevna> how did you end up with the values?
<aiyion> I followed the instructions on the wiki, detemined the base value (416) and toggled gpios in a binary search manner, until I could control them.
<aiyion> e.g. `echo "1" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio496/value` turns blue:rssilow (GPIO 80) >off<.
<Znevna> 496 head is 480
<Znevna> so that would be 16
<aiyion> "cat /sys/class/gpio/gpiochip*/base | head -n1"
<Znevna> yes
<aiyion> 416
<Znevna> but there are three chips
<Znevna> gpiochip416/ gpiochip448/ gpiochip480/
<aiyion> indeed
<Znevna> each with 32 gpios
<aiyion> yes
<Znevna> try the math from 480
<Znevna> and replace the values
<Znevna> see magic ;p
<aiyion> Don't get me wrong, I'll try and likely be successful; but how would I have ended up with 480 in the first place?
<Znevna> I don't know from where the other two gpio chips appear
<Znevna> I've stumbled across the same issue while trying to fix the missing leds on AX53U
<Znevna> and then I've thought "hey, lemme try as head the gpio chip it actually is assigned to" since it makes sense.
<aiyion> I assumed, using 80 was the way of saying "use gpio 16 in bank three"
<aiyion> Using 16 as value raises the question, why the system knows to use bank three and not one of the other two.
<Znevna> somewhere that chip (node?) is defined as being for leds, I don't know. I'm not a dev
<Znevna> I only digged to fix some quirks I didn't like since recently I've started using OpenWrt again
<aiyion> Compiling.
<aiyion> Znevna: were you sucessful on the AX53U? I don't see an upstream commit?
<Znevna> oh I'm far away from a commit lol
<Znevna> not to mention I know nothing about submitting patches
<Znevna> I'm just trying to make it better locally so far
<Znevna> I didn't figure out how to enable the leds for wifi yet
* aiyion bows thankfully, as the rssi-LEDs finally do their job and sit there in silence.
<Znevna> there are multiple open pull requests that try to improve it, each with its own quirks and issues
<Znevna> I'm curios how the lan/wan leds work without being defined x.x
<Znevna> the switch controls them directly?
<Habbie> i was just reading the RTL8367S datasheet and it has pins for the port LEDs
<Habbie> so, without having read any context for your question, it could be that simple
<Znevna> so adding them in the dts would just provide the ability to turn them off
<Znevna> or do something else fancy with them
<aiyion> If possible at all; might be uncontrollable as the Power LED or the 4G LED at the bottom.
<aiyion> I have looked quite a lot for a gpio I'm still missing (the rest line for the LTE modem) I hope I would've noticed if I had lit them up at one point.
<aiyion> The stock devicetreeblob did not contain more than these four LEDs either.
borek has joined #openwrt-devel
<aiyion> Patches are updated. I'm out. Thanks Znevna and Borromini , have a nice evening.
<Znevna> hah
<Znevna> thanks
<Znevna> and you're welcome, g'nite! :)
<Znevna> now if I could only figure out my mt7915 leds
<Znevna> that's the dts used by ax53u in asuswrt
borek has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
[Pokey] has quit [Quit: Hecc! My server must have died!]
[Pokey] has joined #openwrt-devel
GNUmoon has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
GNUmoon has joined #openwrt-devel
<Borromini> same aiyion
PaulFertser has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
PaulFertser has joined #openwrt-devel
csrf has joined #openwrt-devel
robimarko has quit [Quit: Leaving]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has quit [Quit: leaving]
Tapper has quit [Quit: Tapper]
csrf has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
csrf has joined #openwrt-devel
<hauke> did you ask them?
zarzarzar has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
zarzarzar has joined #openwrt-devel
<nick[m]12> hauke: yes
<nick[m]12> hauke: thanks for the mac80211 backport explanation. will try tomorrow
<hauke> nick[m]12: please use the ./gentree.py script carefully, when used wrongly it could delete other unrelaetd folders
<hauke> I have to investigate why
<hauke> If I find some time I want to bild a github action which generates a new backports package and build tests it against multiple kernels
<hauke> currently I rent a 16 core system at hetzner for compile testing
<hauke> but if you wnat to use it for kernel 6.1 it needs many adaptions
<hauke> even for 5.15.74 to 5.15.80 I had to do a modification