micw has joined #openwrt-devel
micw has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
\x has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<owrt-images-builds> Build [#108](https://buildbot.staging.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/84/builds/108) of `openwrt-23.05_ipq40xx/generic` completed successfully.
ptudor has joined #openwrt-devel
filimonic has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
filimonic has joined #openwrt-devel
tSYS has quit [Quit: *squeak*]
tSYS has joined #openwrt-devel
\x has joined #openwrt-devel
<KGB-2> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_x86.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 100.0% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
danitool has quit [Quit: Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos]
djfe_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Ansuel has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
aiyion has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
filimonic has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
Emantor has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
zer0def has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
owrt-images-builds has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
dhewg has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
enyc has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
swegener has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
hauke has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
blocktrron has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
nbd has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
Sagi has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
Habbie has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
mirko has quit [reticulum.oftc.net liquid.oftc.net]
djfe has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
zer0def has joined #openwrt-devel
nbd has joined #openwrt-devel
Ansuel has joined #openwrt-devel
filimonic has joined #openwrt-devel
owrt-images-builds has joined #openwrt-devel
dhewg has joined #openwrt-devel
Emantor has joined #openwrt-devel
enyc has joined #openwrt-devel
swegener has joined #openwrt-devel
aiyion has joined #openwrt-devel
Habbie has joined #openwrt-devel
mirko has joined #openwrt-devel
blocktrron has joined #openwrt-devel
hauke has joined #openwrt-devel
Sagi has joined #openwrt-devel
ptudor has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rua has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<owrt-images-builds> Build [#109](https://buildbot.staging.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/102/builds/109) of `openwrt-23.05_bmips/bcm6362` completed successfully.
ptudor has joined #openwrt-devel
tmn505 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
xavifr has joined #openwrt-devel
valku has quit [Quit: valku]
ptudor has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
lucenera has joined #openwrt-devel
mrkiko has quit [Quit: leaving]
xavifr has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
robimarko has joined #openwrt-devel
<hauke> OpenWrt 23.05.0 final is released
<robimarko> Great news
<KGB-2> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_ath79.html has been updated. (98.7% images and 100.0% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
rua has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
bluew has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
patrykk has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<hitech95> Can someone give me any hint on how to troubleshoot why a FIT image is not correctly flashed into the ubi volumes? The process doesn't throw any error on the syslog. but the update is not applied.
KGB-1 has quit [Quit: KGB-1]
<robimarko> You sure that its getting flashed in the volumes your bootloader expects?
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
mrkiko has joined #openwrt-devel
KGB has quit []
KGB has joined #openwrt-devel
tmn505 has joined #openwrt-devel
torv has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
robimarko has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
raenye has joined #openwrt-devel
robimarko has joined #openwrt-devel
<raenye> rmilecki: thanks for the bc53xx patches you sent upstream, but they do not include ea9200. I'll test both the status=disabled and the fixed link alternatives on my EA9200.
<rmilecki> raenye: in issue i linked to my branch
<rmilecki> with ea9200 change included
<raenye> rmilecki: I saw these, thanks
<raenye> compiling now
<raenye> but maybe the r8000 solution from your [2/2] upstream patch would work too
<rmilecki> raenye: except for MAC address
<rmilecki> raenye: using port 5 means using eth0 which doesn't have MAC assigned in NVRAM
<rmilecki> (tested on my R8000)
<raenye> BTW, why it makes more sense to disable unused ports rather that only enable used ports?
<rmilecki> because those ports are there
<raenye> rmilecki: What should I look for in my EA9200 nvram? etXmacaddr for X=0,1,2?
mkrle has joined #openwrt-devel
<rmilecki> we should describe hardware mainly
<rmilecki> raenye: "nvram show | grep ports"
<rmilecki> there is vlanXports variable for LAN
<rmilecki> (well for WAN too I think)
<rmilecki> check what ports are there
<raenye> rmilecki: but when a SoC supports, say, USB, I often see usb nodes set as disabled
<raenye> vlan2ports=4 8
<raenye> vlan1ports=0 1 2 3 5 7 8*
<rmilecki> raenye: so by vendor design port 8 should be used as CPU
<rmilecki> in this case ports 5 and 7 are use for offloadig with FA engine which we don't support
<raenye> rmilecki: also, et0macaddr and et1macaddr are zeroed
<rmilecki> most likely yes
<raenye> FA accelerates L3 routing, right? like CTF?
<raenye> rmilecki: there's also this -
<raenye> # nvram show | grep devs
<raenye> landevs=vlan1 wl0 wl1 wl2
<raenye> fwd_wlandevs=eth1 eth2 eth3
<raenye> fwddevs=fwd0 fwd1
<raenye> wandevs=et2
<rmilecki> yeah
<raenye> rmilecki: BTW, did you figure out the single device per profile issue? (I still see one binary built with the patch and 20+ without it)
<rmilecki> raenye: i've pushed the fix
<raenye> I did see you committed it, but you were saying it did nothing on your side
<rmilecki> raenye: just extended its description
<rmilecki> raenye: it was about CONFIG_TARGET_MULTI_PROFILE and I put that info in commit body
<raenye> rmilecki: I see. And may I ask why bcm53xx relies on upstream DTS?
<rmilecki> because I'm too lazy to maintain downstream
<raenye> :)
<raenye> But that requires a lot of quiltery
opwrt-ddg_ has joined #openwrt-devel
<rmilecki> also you can use buildroot to build "bcm53xx"
<rmilecki> northstar actually
<raenye> what is buildroot?
<raenye> I build my own, with all my patches
<rmilecki> try google ;)
opwrt-ddg_ has quit [Quit: Page closed]
<raenye> rmilecki: I couldn't understand how is that different from my current build setup (git cloned from openwrt github)
opwrt-orsella has joined #openwrt-devel
<rmilecki> raenye: buildroot?
<rmilecki> it's a totally separated project
<rmilecki> OpenWrt contains bits of some ancient buildroot though
<opwrt-orsella> Hello All, I am currently testing openwrt 23.05.0 on a Banana Pi R3. board. I noticed that the recovery partition on the emmc does not start. By flashing the version of u-boot present in the 23.05-rc2 release using tftp I am able to start the recovery partition.
<opwrt-orsella> I also noticed that the recovery partition on the emmc is not changed when flashing the emmc from NAND. I first flashed NAND booting from SD and then flashed emmc.
<mkrle> hi folks, I haven't contributed to the project in a while, so I was wondering if it's enough to file a PR on GitHub or there is some additional process? not asking for priority/attention, just to make sure I'm not missing anything,
<raenye> opwrt-orsella: how did you enter recovery? press the reset button after poweron?
<opwrt-orsella> Hello, I selected "Boot recovery from emmc" from u-boot using the serial console
valku has joined #openwrt-devel
hanetzer1 is now known as hanetzer
<opwrt-orsella> MMC read: dev # 0, block # 24576, count 256 ... 256 blocks read: OK
<opwrt-orsella> this is the last line that is printed when I select "boot recovery system from emmc"
raenye has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<opwrt-orsella> a similar issue is reported here https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/13239
raenye has joined #openwrt-devel
<raenye> rmilecki: EA9200 with status=disabled works fine
<raenye> at least with the testing kernel
<raenye> I haven't tried the fixed link rate
<raenye> rmilecki: BTW, did you have a look at https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/13553/ ? this should be upstreamed as well.
<hitech95> robimarko, no idea. I only have a single ubi partition in the nand, and the image is working if I flash it via uboot. But I have no idea how to investigate. I was thiking too that there was something wrong with ubi volumes.
<raenye> mkrle: my first PR took a while to be accepted. You could post the PR link here and hopefully get some reviews
<raenye> opwrt-orsella: does it work when booting from nand? from sd?
mentalow has quit [Quit: :]]
mentalow has joined #openwrt-devel
<opwrt-orsella> :raenye I have just tried booting recovery from NAND and SD and, unfortunately, they both do not work
<mkrle> thanks raenye, I'll be patient. there's ~400 open PRs and mine is the same as any other. just wanted to make sure I'm not missing anything
<robimarko> hitech95: Then check the upgrade recipe in OpenWrt
<hitech95> robimarko, the bootloader is expecting a volume called "fit" in the "ubi" partition of the nand. but I don't find any reference of it in the definition of the sysupgrade fit image: https://pastebin.com/68fk5m9w
<hitech95> am I looking in the wrong place?
<robimarko> Beats me, Daniel is probably the one to ask
<rmilecki> raenye: oh, i didn't see that, thanks for that patch
<rmilecki> raenye: please send it for upstream
<rmilecki> raenye: can you confirm that switch ports labels in DT are correct?
<rmilecki> raenye: that "lan1" interface is actually "LAN 1" on device?
<hitech95> robimarko, Yea... I've sent him an email some time ago I'm hoping for a reply. I'm 100% sure it has something to do with the partitions/volumes but I'm not sure on how to proceed.
mkrle has quit []
<mrkiko> opwrt-orsella: your device name? Your openwrt version?
<mrkiko> opwrt-orsella: oh sorry, you told it
<opwrt-orsella> :mrkiko it is a banana pi r3 and I am testing the last OpenWrt stable version 23.05.0
raenye has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
robimarko has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
robimarko has joined #openwrt-devel
<opwrt-orsella> :mrkiko I have just tested rc4 version also. The issue is present also on that version.
xback has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
xback has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
<Borromini> hi guys
<Borromini> is anyone looking after the wiki? Both tmomas and bobafetthotmail seem to be AWOL.
<opwrt-orsella> so no one is having issues running the recovery partition with the OpenWrt 23.05.0 on the Banana Pi R3?
Borromini has quit [Quit: Lost terminal]
<KGB-2> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_lantiq.html has been updated. (95.9% images and 100.0% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
bluew has joined #openwrt-devel
opwrt-orsella has quit [Quit: Page closed]
djfe_ is now known as djfe
<owrt-images-builds> Build [#15](https://buildbot.staging.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/240/builds/15) of `openwrt-22.03_apm821xx/nand` failed.
robimarko has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
xback has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
xback has joined #openwrt-devel
slh64 has quit [Quit: gone]
slh has quit [Quit: leaving]
slh has joined #openwrt-devel
<mrkiko> robihi
<mrkiko> oops :D sorry
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
hitech95 has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]