05:53 <steev> test

05:54 <steev> oh, god damn it

05:55 <steev> i think i know why it isn't relaying into here

06:11 <HdkR> +M?

12:10 <arnd> I just noticed that I'm registered as founder for that channel on libera and never handed it off to anyone else, assuming it wouldn't actually get used after this one started

12:10 <arnd> Should we just shut down the channel on libera?

15:34 <steev> arnd: i'd be fine with that, but i also have no problem running a bridge, there's one user there who absolutely refuses to come here because of the registered user requirement

15:35 <steev> i just need to actually register the bridge name :)

15:36 <arnd> steev: can't robclark just invite that user without requiring registration?

15:37 <steev> no idea, but they don't stay connected

15:38 <robclark> I assume the user doesn't want to do the registration thing needed for NickServ? Doesn't libra do something similar?

15:38 <robclark> I'm fine with the bridge too, as long as it doesn't become a spam bridge ;-)

15:39 <robclark> but haven't really seen spam problems since the early post-freenode days

15:39 <steev> the idea is/was that it would only do messages, no parts/joins/quits

15:39 <robclark> sure, I meant if the libra channel started getting spammed

15:39 <steev> oh, i hven't seen any issues there either

15:50 <steev> we bridge the kali channels between oftc and libera as well because... the kali community can be fickle

15:50 <steev> but that one is a full blown bot with faq responses and whatnot, the bridge would just be the bridge

15:53 <robclark> I think the libera channel also requires nickserv identification to speak, which seems to be enough to block spam

15:55 <steev> their name is "tables" so it's quite likely someone already registered that nick over here and they're mad about it. had a kali user with a similar issue and wanted me to figure out how to give their name back on oftc... and i had to explain to them that i have absolutely nothing to do with running oftc or nickname registrations

15:56 <steev> i gotta say, with lmh in place, it's nice to see that performance bump

15:59 <robclark> whois says there is no such nick over here

16:17 <steev> honestly, i don't care *that* much. definitely not enough to look into their issue(s), but i figure can at least bridge and know when they pop in and ask a question