<mangix>
Grommish: the bug has to do with -fPIE. I assume there's no problem if it does not get passed.
<blocktrron>
tbh, i like the fact you actively have to select your country to use radar channels
<Grommish>
I"ll check, but I dunno why I wouldn't have -fPIE on..
<mangix>
blocktrron: marvel hardware locks the country in EEPROM or firmware
<mangix>
selecting a different one doesn't work IIRC
<Grommish>
But since the target tree is based on the ERLit, I wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't supported
Tusker has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
fda- has joined #openwrt-devel
fda has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<digitalcircuit>
For IPQ8065/NBG6817, I'm beginning my efforts to test a better fix/workaround than outright disabling both 1.4 GHz and 1.75 GHz. First up, the easiest thing - setting both CPUs to the same DVFS (frequency/etc): https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/compare/master...digitalcircuit:ft-fix-ipq8065-reset I don't know if I'm doing this correctly yet; I'll find out when it compiles and I test it :D
<digitalcircuit>
Lesson learned, bug found? If your parallel builds fail, but succeed when compiled verbosely, AND during the verbose build you get prompted about kernel config changes, that's why the parallel builds failed.
<digitalcircuit>
I'm guessing I should report this on the OpenWRT bug tracker?
<digitalcircuit>
When enabling "CONFIG_KERNEL_DETECT_HUNG_TASK", one also needs to specify to the kernel menu (i.e. remove "CONFIG_KERNEL_...") "# DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT is not set" and "# BOOTPARAM_HUNG_TASK_PANIC is not set", however, "make menuconfig" doesn't specify these settings. And adding it to ".config" after saving doesn't work.
<digitalcircuit>
(At least this is my understanding of the issue so far)
danitool has quit [Quit: Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos]
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
<AdrianFL>
Hi, I sent today a couple of patches to the mailing list, but due to a mistake on my mail configuration the patch hasn't been processed by patchwork. Should I attempt resending the patches? I'm asking to avoid flooding the mailing list with unnecessary emails
<gch981213>
ldir: buildbot failure due to my commits - and here's another one
<gch981213>
just some missing kconfig though. I'll push a fix.
<brpr>
Hi everyone! I've gotten the new USB to UART and suprise! It kinda works? I see the bootlog but TX on the chip just sends ^@ constantly and I can't go further than the login prompt.
swalker has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<brpr>
(and yes, I have already re-soldered the connection. It looks good.
<brpr>
)
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
swalker has joined #openwrt-devel
rsalvaterra has joined #openwrt-devel
AdrianFL has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<karlp>
are there ways of having services behind carrier grade nat other than paying the ISP for a "static ip" ? this seems so sucky
rsalvaterra has joined #openwrt-devel
<slh>
karlp: the easiest option is usually to use IPv6(-only) for incoming connections (I have cgNAT for IPv4 and a semi-static /56 IPv6 prefix, wireguard works nicely over IPv6)
<karlp>
yeah, I've used icanhazip and it gave me a v6 address that appears to be correct. mtr from outside shows at least one step beyond the "nova-internet-cpe.cpe.nova.is" but it doesn't get through at least.
<karlp>
connection attempts just time out,
<karlp>
the huawei router has port forward "virtual server" options but no way of selecting v6 or v4,
<karlp>
hrm, I wonder if I put in the v6 addreess of the local device, instead of selecting it from the drop down (which is v4) it might work...
<karlp>
yar, I can't control this huawei router enough for this I think.
<karlp>
guess I'm paying for an ip monthly :|
<slh>
:(
<slh>
it took me a long time to decide if IPv4/cgNAT would be sufficient, but I can get along with that and moving the incoming stuff to IPv6 - but I don't need to deal with some ISP router, plain DHCP from the GPON ONT
<karlp>
yeah, this is for a summer house, I'm not going to try and get it into bridge mode and buy another router for it,
<karlp>
I'll probably look at something like pagekite for the actual service I want behind it anyway.