<mangix>
cool that the reproducible bot runs again
<mangix>
too bad there's little effort to fix the last 2%
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
Misanthropos has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
kenny has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
<stintel>
anyone seen this before with gdbserver / remote-gdb? xml-support.c:567: internal-error: XML_UseForeignDTD failed: requested feature requires XML_DTD support in Expat
<stintel>
looks like we completely disable expat support in gdb, guess that's why
<stintel>
and we can't enable that without moving expat from packages feed
<stintel>
meh
<jow>
mangix: the last 20% take 80% of the effort :)
<stintel>
are all maintainers of packages in the packages feed even aware
<rsalvaterra>
… which nerd-sniped me into taking a look at the trelay source code…
<rsalvaterra>
nbd: … silly question: why does trelay use debugfs and not sysfs? Historical reasons?
<rsalvaterra>
It's not very nice for someone who doesn't have a need for debugfs having to build the kernel with support for it just to be able to use trelay… :/
rua has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<mangix>
stintel: no
<mangix>
I doubt they'd care anyway. Most of the issues are with go and python.
<stintel>
we could open gh issues for it and link to documentation with tips how to make package reproducible
<mangix>
Both are maintained by jeffereyto. Haven't seen him in a while.
wigyori has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
GNUmoon has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
GNUmoon has joined #openwrt-devel
GNUmoon has quit [Max SendQ exceeded]
GNUmoon has joined #openwrt-devel
mattytap_ has joined #openwrt-devel
torv has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
mattytap__ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
mattytap__ has joined #openwrt-devel
<Pepes>
mangix: Yeah, he was busy recently, but not sure if he is still busy, but you can try. He responds as soon as soon possible.
mattytap_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<jow>
can anybody explain to me in simple terms what "full cone NAT" is supposed to be=
<jow>
?
<jow>
I really try to understand it but I always end up reading random blurbs about game consoles and online games
<jow>
one definition is
<jow>
"A full cone NAT is one where all requests from the same internal IP address and port are mapped to the same external IP address and port. Furthermore, any external host can send a packet to the internal host, by sending a packet to the mapped external address."
<jow>
that reads to me like: pick a random port, then make a DNAT and corresponding SNAT rule
<jow>
inbound traffic to that port is directed to an internal machine and internal port
<jow>
outbound traffic from that internal machine and port is rewritten to the chosen external port
Kali_ has joined #openwrt-devel
<jow>
why do people end up writhin entire custom iptables modules for that?
<Kali_>
got a curious question: does anyone know the maximum length of an ubus object path/name?
<jow>
is it some kind of masquerade with predictable outbound rewrite port allocation?
<rsalvaterra>
mangix: I've been using it for a long time, no complaints. This just makes it a first class citizen in the Linux kernel. :)
mattytap__ has joined #openwrt-devel
mattytap_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
wigyori has joined #openwrt-devel
Grommish has joined #openwrt-devel
cbeznea has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<mangix>
rsalvaterra: I ask since I remember reading it failing random tests during upstreaming.
tmn505 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
tmn505 has joined #openwrt-devel
<Grommish>
I want to set up an inbound VPN endpoint device. WireGuard? I want to forward whatever from the edge device to the WAN on an OpenWrt device internal and then bounce outward from there to the internal network (and potentially back out).. Suggestions?
<Grommish>
The target device has three stand-alone eth ports, not a switch
<Grommish>
So.. in to eth0 and then out eth1/2 assigned to the internal network?
<dwfreed>
this sounds like a question for #openwrt
<Grommish>
Eh? Really?
<Grommish>
That sounds like gatekeep, if I'm honest
<Grommish>
The pool here is far better to answer the quesiton than people who use imagebuilder
<dwfreed>
this channel is for openwrt development
<dwfreed>
you're asking a configuration and use question
<Grommish>
I'm not in the mood to argue.. Thank you for your contribution though
<Grommish>
No, I'm asking for input and suggestions