02:59 <owrt-snap-builds> Build [#681](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/19/builds/681) of `ramips/mt7621` completed successfully.

08:07 <[Pokey]> Tapper & slh : The latest snapshot has resolved the 5GHz issues, my doubt was uncalled for!

08:08 <\x> thats nice and all [Pokey]

08:08 <Tapper> [Pokey] Nice one mate. Good news to go with my first coffi.

08:08 <\x> but when are you replacing your gateway with an openwrt one

08:08 <Tapper> hahah

08:09 <\x> all opnwrt fatures arent realized when its not your gateway ;)

08:10 <Tapper> [Pokey] It's OK mate, my gateway does not run openwrt. It is a hub in modem moad from VM UK.

08:12 <[Pokey]> Tapper: Ditto

08:12 <[Pokey]> VM Hub 3

08:12 <[Pokey]> \x: As soon as I get my hands on a cheap RB750Gr3

08:13 <\x> ehhh

08:13 <\x> maybe better to buy like a cheap ass xiaomi r4a

08:13 <Tapper> [Pokey] don't know which mine is. I did have the one with the laggy intel chepset, but when they made a new one they sent me one because I gave them shit about ping spikes.

08:13 <\x> same soc, two less ports

08:13 <\x> has wifi

08:13 <\x> then you use your current unit as your gateway

08:14 <\x> then use whatever opnwrt-abl thing as an xtra AP

08:14 <\x> eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

08:14 <\x> eeee

08:14 <\x> i need to clean my keyboard...

08:17 <[Pokey]> Tapper: Mine *might* be the one with the bug

08:17 <[Pokey]> not sure, probably should check

08:18 <[Pokey]> \x: I might not care about WiFi tbh

08:18 <[Pokey]> I actually have WiFi disabled on my modem because of the new OpenWRT based FT setup

08:24 <\x> maybe you can find some ipq40xx stuff around there, used

08:25 <\x> cheap af and will do 200 cake, 700 codel and route gigabit ez

08:25 <\x> no offloads needed at all just some irq shuffling

11:09 <Namidairo> that janky asus tri-radio 2x2 ipq4019 speaker was on sale yesterday

11:14 <[Pokey]> Namidairo: Link?

11:21 <[Pokey]> \x: I might challenge myself https://www.rigacci.org/wiki/doku.php/doc/appunti/hardware/mxq_s805

12:17 <\x> [Pokey]: if you can get ipq60xx get that one instead. youre willing to compile anyway, right?

12:20 <\x> ahemm https://i.imgur.com/UsgjjzV.png

13:18 <[Pokey]> \x: ? which one

13:24 <\x> the one in the image was 40$ on amazon

13:25 <[Pokey]> Yea I aint throwing $40 at something I don't need :P

13:25 <[Pokey]> 10? yea

13:25 <[Pokey]> 20? maybe

14:11 <[Pokey]> Curious if people use OpenWRT on embedded NASes often?

16:10 <robimarko> mrnuke: You had a chance to test the PSCI workaround?

17:50 <owrt-snap-builds> Build [#797](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/1/builds/797) of `ath79/generic` completed successfully.

18:44 <mrnuke> robimarko: Hi! Yes! It started printing on console, then it crashed enabling WCSS clocks. My next test will be to boot with wifi disabled

18:45 <mrnuke> robimarko: That was a really good workaround, BTW!

18:45 <robimarko> mrnuke: Well, TZ shouldnt really impact clocks

18:45 <robimarko> They are not "secure" yet

18:49 <mrnuke> It's probably some requlator or weird bit we haven't thought about. Will know more once I boot without wifi -- need to physically power cycle the device to get it to reboot

18:49 <[Pokey]> How well would OpenWrt support a Freescale (NXP) P1011 CPU?

18:51 <[Pokey]> I'm seeing very little info

20:05 <[Pokey]> Namidairo: https://www.amazon.co.uk/ASUS-Tri-Band-Bluetooth-Life-Time-Security/dp/B07PKW7SCL ?

22:40 <nick[m]1> I can not send udp packets with a size of 65400 in openwrt? or even with some smaller size

22:41 <nick[m]1> for example: nping --udp -p 2090 10.0.0.1 --data-length 65400 <- does not work

22:43 <nick[m]1> tthere is a buffersize option

22:43 <nick[m]1> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/base-system/system_configuration

22:44 <nick[m]1> but for me it fails when i try to set it

22:44 <grid> [Pokey]: i'm using a p2041 with some unmerged patches based on https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3731

22:44 <grid> it's stable but took a bit of doing to bring the hardware up fully (bootloader, etc.)

22:45 <[Pokey]> grid: was looking at a WatchGuard system cheap

22:45 <[Pokey]> Seems that it might be a complete arse to set up so I probably won't bother

22:45 <grid> someone here has been working on support for a different watch guard. t-series

22:46 <[Pokey]> I should probably be targeting mips and arm devices to learn

22:46 <grid> theyre better/newer cpus. 64bit ppc

22:46 <grid> yeah i wouldnt suggest starting with an unsupported ppc

22:47 <[Pokey]> I have my eyes on a ramips device which does not have support yet

23:00 <[Pokey]> I am offended that a device with only 100mbps ethernet is advertising itself as AC1200

23:06 <slh> plenty of good x86_64 suggestions at https://forum.openwrt.org/t/tips-for-getting-cheap-used-x86-based-firewall-with-full-gbit-nat-a-pc-engines-apu-if-you-are-in-the-us/104490/

23:13 <[Pokey]> slh: those little simplewan boxes seem impossible to get here in the UK

23:16 <slh> [Pokey]: the simplewan stuff is top of the thread, but the least interesting one. very similar would be the cyberoam cr25ing (which are rather cheap in the UK), and a bit better than that the sophos sg/ xg (newer revisions with Atom baytrail-d CPUs), gateprotect GP-7543, barracude f18, etc.

23:17 <slh> works fine for me, http://paste.debian.net/hidden/fc2220f6/

23:17 <[Pokey]> Cr25ing is about 60 to 70

23:18 <slh> there are cheaper ones from time to time - for ~70 GBP you should already get a decent sophos sg/ xg series one

23:19 <[Pokey]> If it's over 30 imo, it's not worth sniffin' because you can get a lot more bang for your buck with a different device which is less intended for routing and more intended for computing

23:20 <[Pokey]> When we're talking in the 70 range I'm almost certain there's better options brand new

23:22 <slh> depends on what you're looking for. x86_64 will do routing up to 1 GBit/s easily (actually still half a asleep in case of baytrail-d, more towards the margin with the amd jaguar/ cr25ing), up to ~830 MBit/s with sqm (j1900). watchguard m300 might be a tad faster doing sqm and sometimes cheaper, but that's still early days (source-only)

23:23 <slh> if you need the speed (and still want good power consumption in the 10 watt range), those used 4-port x86 devices are hard to beat (except by modern x86 router boxes going for ~250 quid from aliexpress/ amazon)

23:25 <[Pokey]> It's definitely something I'll consider in the future I think

23:26 <[Pokey]> For now I think I'm most interested in getting my hands on a ramips or arm device which as a noob, I might have half a chance adding support fro

23:26 <[Pokey]> For*

23:26 <[Pokey]> I need to learn how to handle DTSes most of all I think

23:45 <schmars[m]> quadcore ipq40xx (like e.g. fritzbox 4040) are pretty fast too and relatively cheep

23:46 <schmars[m]> can't give you a upper number on routing, but mine easily does 300 mbps over wireguard (!). i'd need to check it outside my dsl line to get the actual number of what it can do

23:55 <slh> routing on ipq4019, under the very same test conditions (software flow-offloading disabled) is around 300 MBit/s