<soxrok2212>
personally havent seen the slow 802.11ax in a hot minute but i also havent really been checking for it
<Christophe[m]1>
hauke: I saw your mr for the visionfive 1. would you support me adapting it to visionfive 2? I have two of them here.
sauce has quit []
<hauke>
Christophe[m]1: I think there is also a pull request for the version 2
sauce has joined #openwrt-devel
<Christophe[m]1>
(♡ヮ♡)
<Christophe[m]1>
on github?
<f00b4r0>
ynezz, Ansuel: not sure why "grand"_flash? We have "small_flash", the opposite of "small" is "large" or "big". "grand" means something else.
soxrok2212 has quit [Quit: Who ate my gummy worms?]
minimal has joined #openwrt-devel
<Habbie>
can i rely on 1.8.0-pdns1 sorting as newer than 1.8.0-1?
<Ansuel>
f00b4r0 good suggestion but that is really a different change so very simple to change. Maybe grand was used to stress something big and premium ?
<f00b4r0>
Ansuel: i think it might be confusing, esp for non-native speakers.
<f00b4r0>
"big"/"large" are very obvious by comparison.
<f00b4r0>
but maybe these are taboo words nowadays ;^P
schwicht has joined #openwrt-devel
<jakllsch>
# ip -6 route add 2001:db8::/64 tos 10 via 2001:db8:1::1
<jakllsch>
Error: Invalid dsfield (tos): option not available for IPv6.
<jakllsch>
*sigh*
<enyc>
jakllsch: it seems ipv6 uses dscp ... diffserv, or something ...
<jakllsch>
yes, but it's the same bits..
<jakllsch>
it just appears that Linux only implements this for v4
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
<enyc>
jakllsch: so, is this simply not [...] yes
<enyc>
jakllsch: and linux doesn't implement source-based-route-specs for ipv4, only in ipv6 :O
<jakllsch>
heh
<enyc>
jakllsch: you can create messy "ip rule" to do so, etc.
<jakllsch>
Consistency!
<jakllsch>
i tried doing the ip rule thing, but had trouble figuring it out
<enyc>
jakllsch: NB: busybox "ip" command in OpenWRT (at least 22.03) doesn't support the "ip route from" source based route specs (NB: not to be conufsed with "src" source-hints..>).
<jakllsch>
i already rebuilt with iproute2 ip
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
schwicht has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
schwicht has joined #openwrt-devel
raenye has joined #openwrt-devel
<raenye>
Ansuel: maybe it makes sense to talk via IRC instead of github PR
<raenye>
Ansuel: anyway, I'll be heading out soon but will be able to test more iwinfo patches later today and tomorrow
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
<enyc>
jakllsch: yes I just showed the "tos" not in linu xeither... I would guess, TOS on that level isn't used so much now, tend to use other network level layer-2 and similar acting widgets to achieve similar funciton, in some manner...
<Mangix>
soxrok2212: even s is broken. Unfortunate. Guess I'll wait before updating my R1800
<jakllsch>
enyc: eh. i really do want to select a different route based on the value of the TOS/TC/DSCP
Borromini has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<enyc>
jakllsch: maybe you do, but I'm just hypothesisng other changes in networking are suh that its' not used *so much*
<enyc>
jakllsch: write the support for it into linux, then :O
schwicht has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
schwicht has joined #openwrt-devel
schwicht has quit []
schwicht has joined #openwrt-devel
philipp64 is now known as Guest3203
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest3203 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
schwicht has quit [Quit: My MacBook has gone to sleep. ZZZzzz…]
philipp64 is now known as Guest3204
philipp64 has joined #openwrt-devel
Guest3204 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rmilecki has quit [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
rmilecki has joined #openwrt-devel
mcbridematt has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<dvn>
bash: line 1: 8: Bad file descriptor
<dvn>
getting this when the imagebuilder is trying to write out the firmware
<dvn>
noticed this yesterday when i pulled down a new imagebuilder snapshot. i think it's new in the last 10 days or so. that's when i had previously pulled down a snapshot, and it worked. nothing else changed
<slh>
for which device exactly? ~36 is rather large, you might be beyond maximum image limits
<dvn>
gb-pc2
<dvn>
gnubee pc2
djfe has joined #openwrt-devel
<dvn>
it will make imagebuilder fail like that?
<slh>
IMAGE_SIZE := 32448k
<slh>
so you're definitively beyond maximum image limits
<dvn>
yea, you're right. removing a package and now it builds fine
<dvn>
would be nice to have a more descriptive error but at least it prevented me :)
<slh>
oversized images are just deleted, letting the rest of the build process fail gracefully
<dvn>
okay fair enough
<dvn>
we could still print a message
<dvn>
it's obviously the correct behaviour. i just wasn't payint attention close enough
<slh>
if you know what you're searching for, you will find the message in the full build log - but I've never played with the imagebuilder so far (even less its online interface)
<dvn>
imagebuilder is pretty good. i don't like the online interface much though, i just stick to running it local
<slh>
keep in mind that the primary image building use case is on the buildbots, where there are dozens (more) devices which have gotten too small for modern OpenWrt over the years, they shouldn't let the whole build process (for all devices of a target) fail, so these errors are intentionally ignored