ChanServ changed the topic of #asahi-alt to: Asahi Linux: porting Linux to Apple Silicon macs | User-contributed/unofficial distribution ports | Logs: https://alx.sh/l/asahi-alt
<n3ph>
I got it! I was simply missing `usbmuxd`.. I always miss ount on it
<n3ph>
*out
<n3ph>
At least 13.6 is restoring now.
<n3ph>
After this has been finished, I am going to test again if I can pump 15.2 straight into it
<n3ph>
Regarding MacOS space, I wasn't thinking about using it anymore, so that's why I wasn't caring much about leaving space available
<n3ph>
Maybe the installer could use some tweaks, preventing users from choking Mac OS, so upgrades keep working..
<n3ph>
shrinking, btrfs, LUKS, partitions, moving to the back, growing APFS2 volumes... I can't get over it 😭
zumi_ has joined #asahi-alt
zumi has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<chadmed>
the problem is that macos updates keep growing and vary depending on how major the update is
<chadmed>
sequoia downloaded like 18gb and then extraced to like triple that. i had to delete cs2 for it to update
<chadmed>
and especially on 256gb machines its not really practical to be like "sorry leave 60% of your device to macos just in case you want to update it again"
<chadmed>
the 256gb models need to just go away
<n3ph>
True, but the scenario I went into is so heart breaking, I can't really tell how much I regret ATM
<n3ph>
jeah, 256 is really not enough.. as well as 8gb ram
zumi_ is now known as zumi
<n3ph>
I remember discussions about out-of-band FW upgrades. Was this a hallucination?
<tpw_rules>
it would be nice but it hasn't materialized yet. i haven't looked into what would be necessary in a while
<chadmed>
at a minimum it will almost certainly require SEP
<jannau>
n3ph: when did you install? I think the current installer is quite conservative about the amount of space it leaves for macos (something around 60 - 70 GB for a fresh macos)
<n3ph>
jannau: looong ago, and I did choke it intentionally...
<n3ph>
I just haven't thought of upgrades
n3ph has quit [Quit: WeeChat 4.4.3]
<janrinze>
chadmed: with those iso files the idea is that you can just boot from it and install? (awesome!)
n3ph has joined #asahi-alt
<chadmed>
janrinze: yup, just dd it onto a usb stick and boot it from u-boot
<n3ph>
.. which means, you'll need a UEFI-only install already..
<chadmed>
soonish the official gentoo arm64 install media will support apple silicon but as i said above theres still a couple of things to tie up before that can happen
<janrinze>
yeah.. i see. Okay, was just dreaming ;-)
<chadmed>
iboot simply does not support arbitrary usb boot. there will never be a way around needing the uefi-only install
<janrinze>
But.. UEFI-only install could be very interesting to try out various distro's
<chadmed>
well it installs everything up to u-boot and optionally lets you reserve some free space for your future rootfs
<janrinze>
So: if I do UEFI-only install then It would be possible to boot an ISO for either a live OS on ISO or an installer on ISO.
<chadmed>
it is intended specifically for allowing you to boot/install any distro that supports ebbr
<chadmed>
yep, so long as it has the asahi infrastructure baked in
<chadmed>
(kernel/initramfs, asahi-scripts, etc)
<janrinze>
i don't know ebbr, Google said it's Brussels Airport :-D
<chadmed>
arm reusing icao codes :p
<chadmed>
its arm's embedded boot flow spec
<janrinze>
Ah.. ARM has upgraded to four-letter acronyms
<chadmed>
basically a lowest common denominator set of specs required to boot arm64. in a nutshell its basically just "your board must have a devicetree and uefi via u-boot"
<janrinze>
Ah.. sounds great. Same as my chromebook.
<chadmed>
theres a more full-fat version that mandates smbios/acpi and a bunch of other useless crap for servers but we dont care about that
<chadmed>
but it gives OS/distro developers a common target for the platform and goes a decent way to solving one of the major problems with arm64 compared to wintel which is that you cant just shove a random boot disk in and expect it to boot exactly the same way on every machine
<janrinze>
Hope more vendors will implement it. Then ports to those new devices will be much quicker.
<chadmed>
most vendors do, but it wont help with porting speed. thats all drivers
<janrinze>
chadmed: I have not yet seen a 'universal' ARM kernel. But we might get there with such boot load standards
<janrinze>
chadmed: UEFI should give access to basic I/O and screen. (if implemented correctly)