07:54 <mal> bamse: any chance of getting this small patch into 6.3 https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221218211957.118473-1-matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com/ would make sending next patches easier

07:55 <krzk> mal: yes, this was intentional

07:56 <krzk> halt regs are not part of the mutex

07:56 <krzk> mal: as you pointed - they are above 0x1000.

07:57 <mal> krzk: ok, then why are those part of it in msm8974 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi#n1197

07:58 <mal> krzk: what kind of node should be used for halt-regs then?

08:01 <krzk> mal: indeed, I wrote 8974 weird... not like others. In all other devices I split syscon from the mutex, so the msm8974 should rather go similar way.

08:06 <z3ntu> krzk: So in msm8226 we have tcsr_mutex at 0xfd484000 (size 0x1000) and for e.g. https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-hammerhead-3.4-kk-r1/arch/arm/boot/dts/msm8226.dtsi#822 we make a simple syscon at 0xfd485000 (size also 0x1000?) ?

08:09 <krzk> z3ntu: yes, similarly to sm8150 and few others

08:11 <mal> thanks, I will fix that for msm8226 together with my modem changes