03:15 <owrt-images-builds> Build [#55](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/192/builds/55) of `openwrt-23.05_bcm27xx/bcm2708` completed successfully.

07:31 <\x> hi, are there already cortex-a73 targets aside from banana pi r4?

13:18 <f00b4r0> ynezz: out of curiosity, how did we end up having both a bzip2 and xz archive of xs-utils 5.6.1? Looking at sources.o.o it seems it happened a couple times.

13:20 <f00b4r0> (I hope it doesn't suggest different builders built from different source archive - that would be rather bad, regardless of backdoor)

13:22 <stintel> tools/xz had PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.bz2, packages feed had PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.xz for 5.6.1

13:23 <f00b4r0> eww

13:27 <schmars[m]> removing bz2 host tool might fix https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/14226 ;)

13:28 <f00b4r0> i wish we stopped using xz archives for anything tbh. But that's another topic I guess :)

14:26 <aparcar> Mangix: could you please follow up here? https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/apk-tools/-/merge_requests/171

16:59 <mrnuke> Ansuel, robimarko: for patches to IPQ95xx that I plan to submit upstream, is it a good idea to run them through you for sanity checking?

17:14 <robimarko> mrnuke: I can take a look, but do note that I am not familiar with that SoC at all

17:37 <mrnuke> robimarko: That would be appreciated. I plan to have a clean branch on github by end of today. that might be tomorrow for your time zone

17:38 <robimarko> mrnuke: sounds good to me

17:55 <robimarko> rmilecki: When you have time, please look at https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/15042

17:56 <robimarko> It fixes 6.6 compilation, but I dont have a way of testing whether it breaks something

19:54 <aparcar> Mangix: did you ever managed to compile libxml2 on macos?

21:20 <Znevna> so.. does anyone have any experience with freebox devices? :P

22:36 <Mangix> aparcar: i don't use macos

22:39 <Mangix> aparcar: as far as the apk thing is concerned, I don't think there's a good way to fix it that upstream would be happy with. I can clean it up but it wouldn't solve the use case under OpenWrt.

22:39 <Mangix> which means a local patch would need to be carried instead of having the rpath hack

22:40 <Mangix> it's a patch vs. a one liner

23:55 <aparcar> Mangix: well than I take the one line