<slh>
you never really know if DHCPv5 continues working after the next upgrade - and you don't know at all if upgrading over ssh will finish successfully
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
silver has quit [Quit: One for all, all for One (2 Corinthians 5)]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
greearb__ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
greearb has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
danitool has quit [Quit: Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos]
Rentong_ has quit [Read error: No route to host]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 481 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong_ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Acinonyx_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Acinonyx has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong__ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong__ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
silver has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<ldir>
rsalvaterra: ping - re dnsmasq - I know what's going on and I've fallen on the side of 'init.d/dnsmasq' is doing something wrong which is now properly checked by dnsmasq
<ldir>
the solution is for the init script to append an instance id eg. '--enable-ubus=dnsmasq.$instance'
rmilecki has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
<ldir>
rsalvaterra: and now I've been persuaded that dnsmasq is being a bit too thorough
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Read error: No route to host]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong__ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong__ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
rejoicetreat has joined #openwrt-devel
SamantazFox has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
jlsalvador has quit [Quit: jlsalvador]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
jlsalvador has joined #openwrt-devel
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
<rmilecki>
i noticed 256 B attached to every Xiaomi firmware: https://pastebin.com/raw/YC67euYj - can anyone recognize / guess what may it be?
<ldir>
and now I've decided that multiple instances of dnsmasq in openwrt are fundamentally broken - 'cos everything assumes the default ubus ID is being used.
<rmilecki>
is that some RSA signature?
<ldir>
rsalvaterra: ping
SamantazFox has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<rsalvaterra>
ldir: Morns! Just read your messages, good to know it's something simpler! :)
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
<hauke>
rmilecki: is there any pattern in there or is it random?
<rmilecki>
hauke: i extracted 4 signatures from 4 different firmwares
<rmilecki>
i don't see any simlar parts in those chunks
<rmilecki>
it seems Xiaomi uses RSA 256 B signature
takim has joined #openwrt-devel
<Namidairo>
yeah check the references to openssl in their updater
chwba has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<rsalvaterra>
mangix: I also have IPv4 only. To replace dnsmasq, in my case, odhcpd *must* support IPv4 correctly. :/
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<hauke>
rmilecki: when I put the data into this it also thinks it is very random: https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/#recipe=From_Hexdump()Entropy('Shannon scale')
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rejoicetreat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rejoicetreat has joined #openwrt-devel
rejoicetreat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rejoicetreat has joined #openwrt-devel
aleasto has joined #openwrt-devel
feriman has joined #openwrt-devel
rejoicetreat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rejoicetreat has joined #openwrt-devel
rejoicetreat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rejoicetreat has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
rejoicetreat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rejoicetreat has joined #openwrt-devel
rejoicetreat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rejoicetreat has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
aleasto has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
takim has quit [Quit: Disconnected]
feriman has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.2]
feriman has joined #openwrt-devel
rejoicetreat has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
feriman has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rejoicetreat has joined #openwrt-devel
dorf has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
<Slimey>
<russell--> Slimey: start by identifying the hardware, finding a serial console, identifying the bootloader, obtaining GPL'd source, etc, yup got all that
Tapper has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
rejoicetreat has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
Rentong has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
dedeckeh has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
fieryeagle954[m] has joined #openwrt-devel
<blogic_>
rsalvaterra: yes
Rentong_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong__ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Rentong__ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
arifre has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
arifre has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<rsalvaterra>
Back.
<ldir>
side
<rsalvaterra>
ldir: Waiting for the big game, here… :)
<rsalvaterra>
blogic_: Have you pushed out your dnsfwd prototype anywhere? :)
<ldir>
I'm doing MLS tonight (again) it was a total omnishambles last night, this evening much smoother - kit in place & working and we've already got feed & comms to site - living the dream!
<ldir>
when I say omnishambles I mean total f*ing omnishambles
<philipp64>
Is Vincent Weimann (CodeFetch) on this channel?
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 483 seconds]
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Luke-Jr has joined #openwrt-devel
<aiyion>
philipp64: hes notified.
<ldir>
rsalvaterra: ha, so simon has rejected the patch, providing sensible reasoning which can be summed up as 'don't try to start more than one dnsmasq instance with the same ubus name'
CodeFetch has joined #openwrt-devel
<aiyion>
philipp64: tada.
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
<CodeFetch>
Hi philipp!
<ldir>
as I suggested then its append an instance ID to the ubus name for each dnsmasq instance, except the primary instance where we use the default instance id of 'dnsmasq'.
<ldir>
and/or teach all dnsmasq ubus clients about multiple instances instead of just assuming only one instance with a default name of 'dnsmasq'
<ldir>
the quick & dirty workaround is to add option ubus 0 to all the 2ndary dnsmasq instance configs.
<CodeFetch>
@philipp64 Your PR looks good to me except that you rename the local_leftip to local_ip. I think it would be the best if we could add another init.d file for a /etc/config/strongswan file which completely reflects the swanctl conf.
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<CodeFetch>
I prefer strongswan over swanctl, because it reflects the package name. This is what I would expect as a user.
<CodeFetch>
Thus I suggest that the swanctl.init you are currently working on should be used for /etc/config/ipsec and reflect the legacy IPSec configuration format used by other IPSec implementations. Therefore instead of local_leftip I would just call it leftip
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
feriman has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
<philipp64>
CodeFetch: I re-rolled some of your changes. Did you have a look?
<philipp64>
oh, guess so... need to scroll more...
<philipp64>
CodeFetch: I don't think the config should be overly tied to the package... that's not how orchestration works. Look at Netconf or YANG. They use a protocol-based model that's implementation agnostic.
SamantazFox is now known as Guest727
SamantazFox has joined #openwrt-devel
<nick[m]4>
blocktrron: If I flash my fritzbox 7530 with a 21.02 image that I created via imagebuilder, any further sysupgrade is not working. any idea?
<philipp64>
CodeFetch Thermi: what's wrong with "local_ip"?
Guest727 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<Thermi>
philipp64, Hmmmh?!
<philipp64>
Any issues with renaming "local_leftip" just "local_ip"?
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
<Thermi>
No issue with it
<Thermi>
I had a problem with "local_leftip"
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
<philipp64>
I'll merge if no one objects...
<philipp64>
We can make more changes incrementally...
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
<philipp64>
Does anyone use ipcomp?
Rentong has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rmilecki has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rektide has joined #openwrt-devel
<blocktrron>
nick[m]4: can you be more precise? what does "not working mean"?
<blocktrron>
Is it dead after that?
<nick[m]4>
blocktrron: no. it just stays at it is. I try to figure out what is happenning.
<nick[m]4>
I flashed 19.07 -> 21.02 (that worked)
<nick[m]4>
afterwards flashed an image created with imagebuilder
<nick[m]4>
21.02 (snapshot)
<nick[m]4>
now flashing trunk, oder 19.07, or stock 21.02, does not work anymore
<nick[m]4>
I would like trying 21.02 (openwrt original image) -> 19.07 again, however I'm currently stucked getting tftpboot working again
<nick[m]4>
syupgrade does not abort, or gives an error. the device reboots, but nothing changed
Rentong has joined #openwrt-devel
<PaulFertser>
nick[m]4: probably your device is a dual-firmware one?
<nick[m]4>
PaulFertser: I don't believe it is dual-firmware. how can I check?
<PaulFertser>
nick[m]4: the partition table should reveal that
<nick[m]4>
blocktrron: no :( I had not the equipment
<nick[m]4>
PaulFertser: ipq40xx, fritz!box 7530
<blocktrron>
uboot0/uboot1 is the dual-kernel from AVMs implementation, they both contain the same bootloader
<blocktrron>
from there they load the same kernel from the ubi volume
<PaulFertser>
nick[m]4: I see, do not listen to me, listen to blocktrron :)
<blocktrron>
Anyways, I have no ad-ho clue
<blocktrron>
and there are currently 150km seperating me from my unit
<nick[m]4>
blocktrron: okay, I will try getting uart working
<blocktrron>
modifying settings still work?
<nick[m]4>
<blocktrron "modifying settings still work?"> yeü
<nick[m]4>
yes
<nick[m]4>
blocktrron: yes
<nick[m]4>
sry, matrix bridge
<blocktrron>
does sysupgrade / sysupgrade -n make a difference?
<nick[m]4>
blocktrron: I can tell that sysupgrade -n was not helping. I will try again as soon I am able to flash openwrt again. I used recovery tool to get back to original
<nick[m]4>
arrrgh finally, I tftbooted but forgot to start tftp server. xD I will try first going 21.02 and 19.07
<blocktrron>
i can try to reproduce this on a repeater3000
<nick[m]4>
blocktrron: we have a bunch of those 7530s, for some of them wifi also does not work. I read that some ipq40xx devices had also trouble getting calibration data. however iw shows that wifi is up, but there is no wifi... for some of the devices it works. on fritz!os it always works.
<nick[m]4>
maybe there is some hardware revision that differs?
<nick[m]4>
however, I can not tell if there is a change since all labels are removed from those devices ^^
<PaulFertser>
nick[m]4: what do you get in dmesg when you try to "ip l s dev wlan0 up" or similar on those devices?
<blocktrron>
nick[m]4: can you check if the urlader partition has wifi calibration data in the offsets they are extracted from
<blocktrron>
there was already a change in where this is stored, hene it tries to extract from two offsets
<nick[m]4>
blocktrron: is there a difference between urloader0/1?