03:51 <KGB-2> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_x86.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 99.8% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)

08:31 <KanjiMonster> uh-oh https://www.zdnet.com/article/long-term-support-for-linux-kernel-to-be-cut-as-maintainence-remains-under-strain/

08:32 <KanjiMonster> it's not retroactive, but 2 years would have meant that 5.15 would reach EOL this year

08:48 <robimarko> Not shocking really as there arent enough people to do it really

08:49 <robimarko> Stable has asked for some contribution back from the corporate users that complain, at least in a form of testing stuff

09:48 <Znevna> "While I'm sure someone out there is still running 4.14 in a production Linux system, there can't be many of them. "

09:48 <Znevna> lul

09:48 <Znevna> I know a lot of devices based on 4.14 :P

09:49 <robimarko> And do they ever receive kernel updates?

09:49 <Znevna> doubt it

09:49 <SwedeMike> 6 year old kernel. Yeah, that'll be in use in lots of places

09:49 <Znevna> only tiny hacks, maybe.

09:49 <robimarko> That is the point, it doesnt matter if its maintained as nobody is updating it

09:50 <Znevna> we don't have enough Padavans

09:50 <Znevna> ^^

12:13 <\x> isnt there the cip / SLTS kernels thingy

12:15 <aparcar> zx2c4: you don't happen to implement this new pqxdh protocol from signal messenger for wireguard handshakes, too, do you?

13:12 <schmars[m]> I'm playing with ucode, wireguard and netlink a lot lately. Noticed that RTM_NEWLINK/SETLINK arent fully namespace aware. There was a kernel patchseries in 2019 that was pretty much okay but stalled. Is that sonething that'd be worth adding to openwrt kernel patches?

13:13 <schmars[m]> Already contacted the author about resubmitting it, we'll see

16:40 <philipp64> lynxis: have you seen https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/13411?

16:43 <philipp64> Znevna: I bet there are boxes running 2.36

17:45 <KGB-0> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_omap.html has been updated. (11.1% images and 99.8% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)

17:50 <philipp64> Znevna: and Mofi is still shipping Barrier Breaker (14.07)

17:50 <philipp64> ... which has a 3.10 kernel

18:06 <robimarko> Realtek is still using 2.36 on their switches

19:03 <philipp64> Good god.

19:18 <johnf> does anyone have an idea why these devices are flagged as supporting NMRP? I'm quite certain it's an error: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/nmrp-not-working-on-linksys-e7350/171962

19:41 <Borromini> johnf: i think so too, the commit for the E7350 e.g. surely doesn't mention NMRP

19:45 <johnf> Borromini: any idea how to fix it? I can tell you that NMRP definitely didn't work and the serial logs don't show any NMRP related messages

19:47 <Borromini> edit the respective hardware data pages, I'd say

21:33 <dwfreed> yeah, considering nmrp is netgear specific

21:34 <dwfreed> and the linksys e7350 and belkin rt1800 (same device, different brand name) are the only non-netgear devices listed as "supporting" it