03:26 <Fijxu> can someone help me on a OpenWRT package creation? Becuase I'm following the instructions of https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-developer/toolchain/use-buildsystem. I'm currently at step 4-5 of the section "Creating a local feed", but when I run `./scripts/feeds update -a;` the package from `my_packages` is not being added to the index file

03:26 <Fijxu> it makes no sense

06:48 <Habbie> openwrt vibes ;) https://blog.brixit.nl/making-a-linux-managed-network-switch/

07:23 <rmilecki> hauke: i tested "mac80211: Update to version 6.1.96-test2" with brcmfmac on Luxul XWR-3150 (2 x BCM4366)

07:23 <rmilecki> works just fine

07:57 <rmilecki> hauke: does it make sense to test your mac80211 update on Netgear WAX218 (QCN5024 + QCN5054)?

09:37 <rmilecki> hauke: I also tried mac80211 update with Netgear WAX218 (QCN5024 + QCN5054) - it uses kmod-ath11k

09:37 <rmilecki> seems good to

09:37 <rmilecki> *too

10:54 <KGB-2> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_mpc85xx.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 100.0% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)

13:20 <f00b4r0> hauke: do you want to wait for jow's return or should I prepare a bump of ucode in 23.05? There are a number of fixes (but also a number of new features, so not sure how we deal with that) that would be useful to have in the next service release

13:22 <Ansuel> mhhh maybe we can backport them?

13:22 <Ansuel> main thing to check if the update would cause any regression

13:22 <Ansuel> but imho we should just bump the package and be done with it

13:25 <f00b4r0> that would be my opinion as well :)

14:04 <robimarko> Has anybody ever seen free() cause an Illegal instruction on ARMv7 but not on ARMv8 with the same code?

14:04 <robimarko> Its even the same CPU

14:05 <robimarko> Ok, it was me being stupid(Again)

14:07 <f00b4r0> ;)

18:17 <hauke> f00b4r0: Ansuel: I am not a ucode expert

18:17 <hauke> if you want to backport it it is fine with me

18:17 <Ansuel> ?

18:20 <Ansuel> oh for ucode

18:20 <Ansuel> lets just bump

19:04 <hauke> rmilecki: thanks for tesing

20:18 <Mangix> I hate mailing lists

20:35 <Ansuel> i'm crazy enough of considering using overlayfs in our build system LOL

20:35 <Ansuel> it might handle a very specific case

20:41 <Mangix> Ansuel: why?

20:42 <Ansuel> to generate per rootfs initramfs

20:42 <Ansuel> we really need to a way to have the current kernel build as a base and apply files on top of it in a parallel way

20:43 <Ansuel> (without having to copy the thing all around)