hanetzer has quit [Quit: WeeChat 3.8]
danitool has quit [Quit: Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos]
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
bluew has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
djfe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
fakuivan has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
fakuivan has joined #openwrt-devel
Slimey has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Slimey has joined #openwrt-devel
lmore377 has joined #openwrt-devel
tSYS has quit [Quit: *squeak*]
tSYS has joined #openwrt-devel
djfe has joined #openwrt-devel
djfe_ has joined #openwrt-devel
minimal has quit [Quit: Leaving]
djfe__ has joined #openwrt-devel
djfe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
djfe_ has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
djfe__ has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
fakuivan has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
hanetzer has joined #openwrt-devel
fakuivan has joined #openwrt-devel
<dhewg> nbd: that seems to have fixed it. first morning where both sides can reach each other
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<owrt-snap-builds> Build [#836](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/5/builds/836) of `mxs/generic` failed.
gladiac has joined #openwrt-devel
<nbd> dhewg: thanks for confirming. yesterday i updated the fix commit for the mesh fast xmit code in my staging tree
<nbd> can you please test that?
<nbd> i found and fixed some more bugs in the code
<dhewg> ok, so back to HEAD + your staging
<dhewg> will do, is that a general issue or does it make sense that this is somehow related to wan reconnects/ip changes
<nbd> i'm still not sure what exactly triggers it
<nbd> so i just keep reviewing the code to look for discrepancies between mesh fast xmit path handling and regular mesh path handling
<dhewg> yeah, it's a bit confusing, it may be some combination, the wan ip change might be a red herring, it may be time related with expired/stale arp/cache entries, but I can only guess
<dhewg> I can't reproduce with a forced pppoe reconnect at least
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
gladiac has quit [Quit: k thx bye]
<nbd> dhewg: do you have any devices that connect switch between different nodes somehow (e.g. roaming)?
<dhewg> no roaming, but notebook might pick up one of 2g/5g/6g, whatever it sees first
<dhewg> the ipq router has quite some nets though, 3*2g, 2*5g (one beeing the mesh), 1*6g
<dhewg> one of the 2g is a ap/wds one, because one older ath9k device doesn't support mesh
<dhewg> and then multiple wireguard connections and a dsl pppoe
<dhewg> and the mt mesh device has multiple wired clients, as does the wds one
<dhewg> so not exactly easy to find out what exactly triggers this
<stintel> ath9k device not supporting mesh? I would think all ath9k devices support mesh because there is no firmware that can get in the way
<dhewg> hm, I may confuse it? Maybe I didn't want to setup yet another wifi net for 2g mesh and switched 2g ap to 2g wds?
<stintel> (I have never used mesh, as I don't believe in it, but I would be really surprised if you have an ath9k device that doesn't support it)
<dhewg> okay, so let's assume I chose wds to avoid adding another net
<dhewg> ;)
<dhewg> and I basically use mesh to "bridge rooms", wired is unfortunately not an option
<stintel> yeah, I get why people use mesh, but for me it's the other way around. not wired is not an option
<stintel> my wifi works well because it's wired
<stintel> :P
<dhewg> hehe :P
<dhewg> but then there's the WAF
<dhewg> which plays a role here too
<stintel> I would actually consider mesh now that there's 6G
<stintel> 5G between mesh nodes and 6G for clients
spyrral has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
shoragan has quit [Quit: quit]
shoragan has joined #openwrt-devel
T-Bone has joined #openwrt-devel
f00b4r0 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
f00b4r0 has joined #openwrt-devel
T-Bone has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
rua has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
danitool has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
radian has joined #openwrt-devel
<radian> hi, is it possible to get a wiki account?
<radian> hmm, will register a forum account, then see
djfe has joined #openwrt-devel
<djfe> how is dsa supposed to be done for 1-port devices? I have to recover two devices now, because swport5 wasn't the right port-choice, or so it seems ^^
<djfe> do I have to test all ports one by one and build up to 5 images?
<djfe> or can I build an image for ipq40xx and set all 5 swports to okay, install, boot and then see which one of them works?
<djfe> I'm trying to add Netgear EX6150v2 and Zyxel WRE6606 https://github.com/Djfe/openwrt/commits/DSA_EX6150v2 (the two commits are in this branch)
<owrt-snap-builds> Build [#799](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/master/images/#builders/54/builds/799) of `ramips/mt7620` failed.
minimal has joined #openwrt-devel
djfe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<tmn505> and he left when I was writing
djfe has joined #openwrt-devel
<tmn505> djfe: basically yes, unless You know which port was it. I think phy-tools could be used to check which port was connected also wasn't it visible in kernel log which port was used on old swconfig? Anyway, don't build five images, simply enable all ports and see which gets connected.
djfe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
djfe has joined #openwrt-devel
<djfe> tmn505: thx for your answer :)
<djfe> I still need a bouncer, but I won't miss any messages thx to irc log
<djfe> I'll report back, when I know more. Your answer was very helpful
djfe has left #openwrt-devel [#openwrt-devel]
djfe has joined #openwrt-devel
<radian> if a soc has two different processors, how should I list it in a table that is asking for cpu mhz? linux can be booted on either processor
<radian> should I only list the ARM core?
<djfe> You could ask the same for big.Little setups which are getting more common actually and I'm wondering myself
<djfe> though for those you'd probably list the higher frequencies of the little cores
<radian> well, I'm just going to list them both and specify the core count
<hauke> radian: which device do you have?
<radian> hauke: this is for bcm33xx
<hauke> probably listing the CPU core you run OpenWrt on is fine
<hauke> bcm33xx is a SoC family with multiple different SoCs
<radian> I know
<radian> I'm updating the table
<hauke> ok
<radian> https://i.ibb.co/g91M7TJ/image.png this is what I'm thinking of
<radian> I don't like how the 3390's first column looks, though, but this soc is weird
<hauke> looks ok
<radian> like, one variant is ddr3, and then later ones are ddr4
torv has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<djfe> about my last message, I meant to say "big" cores
torv has joined #openwrt-devel
<djfe> radian: that table isn't part of tech data, is it? you could add columns for additional socs
<radian> it is
<radian> hmm
<radian> 3300 also has a TLB, I see
<djfe> hauke: I hope me mentioning you on Github so often a couple of days ago didn't throw you off. :/
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<radian> this is confusing, actually
<radian> there are socs with the same product name, but completely different internals
<djfe> I could look into that. Link please
<radian> https://i.ibb.co/BCMn0ND/image.png I think this will work
<radian> these devices don't use cfe, there's two bootloaders
<radian> well, officially if you want to exclude vxworks, etc
bluew has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
valku has joined #openwrt-devel
<radian> so, I'm wondering what to call the brcm cm bootloader
Ryncewynd has joined #openwrt-devel
<radian> apparently it's just referred to as "cmboot" or the like, but for 3384 and later, it was replaced with BOLT
bluew has quit [Quit: Leaving]
bluew has joined #openwrt-devel
radian has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.9.x-git-211-51c77e65 - https://znc.in]
spyrral has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.9.x-git-211-51c77e65 - https://znc.in]
radian has joined #openwrt-devel
KGB-2 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<djfe> ok not much of a clue. But since when is there only one kind of bootloader per soc/chipset?
<djfe> I could be wrong though
<djfe> maybe write what you were able to find out and leave a few sources as footnotes, if you feel the info is important :)
<djfe> you could update links on that page from oldwiki to the current one :)
<djfe> Netgear DG384G links to the oldwiki atm.
<radian> sources? well, how am I supposed to link to proprietary code?
<djfe> the DG384G is using bootloader ADAM2 (in-case it matters)
<djfe> then don't 😅
KGB-2 has joined #openwrt-devel
<djfe> I have to correct myself the DG384G Broadcom variants use cfe
<djfe> nice
<radian> I don't get why'd they let OEMs build bootloaders with no image validation enabled, though
<radian> well, actually, no, they'd be building it, so ????
<radian> *with secboot on
spyrral has joined #openwrt-devel
Rincewind_ has joined #openwrt-devel
Ryncewynd has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
<Znevna> hello
<djfe> up to speculation. Did some boards get shipped with secure boot disabled?
<radian> no, I read through the cmboot code
<radian> if SECURE_BOOT is defined, it will only adjust an offset to compensate for the public key and stuff
<djfe> Maybe some devs don't or didn't have any workflow for building with validation during development. Developers were lazy in the past. The boards are older, right?
<radian> yeah, they'd be from 2009 or so
<radian> I'm pretty sure this would apply to newer versions of that bootloader, though
<radian> I think for 3390 they switched to bolt, not sure
<radian> florian would know, but he's under an NDA
<radian> the binary blobs for the ethernet drivers, anyway, is just creating a "virtual" link between ecos
<Rincewind_> latest snapshot (and previous) keep giving me irq 23: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) and shuts down radio on Archer C7 V2. Can I fix something or go back top stable ?
Ryncewynd has joined #openwrt-devel
Rincewind_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<radian> with regards to bcm63xx, there is a whole new series of chips now
<radian> bcm67xx
<hauke> djfe: I am mostly ignoring the notifiations when I am getting mentioned on github
<radian> hmm, no dsl core, I see
<radian> part of what confuses me, is what to do when adding in a new target where every other soc is mips
<radian> err, maybe I mean *device
<radian> I think it'd need a new target, no? maybe something similar to bmips
djfe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Ryncewynd has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Lynx- has joined #openwrt-devel
Tapper has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
djfe has joined #openwrt-devel
<djfe> hauke: I see, is it possible then to help with moderation of issues on GitHub? I commented on many issues that have been fixed.
<djfe> It would be nice reducing the number of open issues.
djfe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<neoraider> Hmm, someone assigned my uclient patch to myself in patchwork ( http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openwrt/patch/5191625b48c2dd44d5e094d12a12b608d1a6bae5.1677273776.git.mschiffer@universe-factory.net/ ). While I could merge it myself, I was hoping to get a review from someone actually familiar with libuclient first
<hauke> neoraider: I think the patches are automatically assigned to the person sending the patch
<hauke> when I send a patch it also gets assigned to me some hours later
<hauke> or is someone doing this manually?
<neoraider> Huh, that's kind of a weird default, if it happens automatically
djfe has joined #openwrt-devel
hanetzer has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
djfe has quit [Quit: -a- IRC for Android 2.1.60]
spyrral has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
radian has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<hauke> aparcar[m]: I just pushed to ustream-ssl and got these messages: https://paste.debian.net/1272090/
Tapper has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
Tapper has joined #openwrt-devel
radian has joined #openwrt-devel
<aparcar[m]> hauke: looks wrong to me
<aparcar[m]> Master branch is there
Lynx- has quit [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
spyrral has joined #openwrt-devel
<hauke> aparcar[m]: it looks strange, I do not know what it did
<neoraider> The log looks like the branches on the Github mirror had weird names before (with an origin/ prefix), and the mirror action has replaced them, so now the mirror actually matches the git.openwrt.org repo
Ryncewynd has joined #openwrt-devel
Ryncewynd has quit [Quit: Leaving]
fakuivan_ has joined #openwrt-devel
aiyion_ has joined #openwrt-devel
aiyion has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
fakuivan has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
aiyion_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
aiyion_ has joined #openwrt-devel
fakuivan has joined #openwrt-devel
fakuivan_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
cmonroe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
cmonroe has joined #openwrt-devel
cmonroe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
cmonroe has joined #openwrt-devel
cmonroe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
cmonroe has joined #openwrt-devel
cmonroe has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
aiyion_ has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
aiyion_ has joined #openwrt-devel
T-Bone has joined #openwrt-devel
srslypascal has joined #openwrt-devel
f00b4r0 has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Mangix has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
Mangix has joined #openwrt-devel
house has joined #openwrt-devel