<owrt-images-builds> Build [#49](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/197/builds/49) of `openwrt-23.05_mvebu/cortexa53` failed.
minimal has quit [Quit: Leaving]
Emantor has joined #openwrt-devel
tSYS has quit [Quit: *squeak*]
tSYS has joined #openwrt-devel
theJoker8814 has joined #openwrt-devel
digitalcircuit has quit [Quit: Signing off from Quassel - see ya!]
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<KGB-2> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/openwrt/openwrt_mpc85xx.html has been updated. (100.0% images and 99.9% packages reproducible in our current test framework.)
gch981213 has joined #openwrt-devel
<f00b4r0> enyc: it appears it's too late for that. I wouldn't have bypassed jow anyway. It's too bad because there were some important fixes in ucode that won't be in 23.05.3 afaict.
<enyc> f00b4r0: what does that afect in usage?
<enyc> f00b4r0: yes; i've discovered 23.05.3 building towards release or whatever
<f00b4r0> netlink usage and well as error reporting
<f00b4r0> (that I know of)
<enyc> f00b4r0: in what ways? and is this longstanding issue or a recent regression?
<f00b4r0> sorry busy right now. Changelog has the details
Mangix has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
robimarko has joined #openwrt-devel
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
aiyion has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<owrt-images-builds> Build [#50](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/197/builds/50) of `openwrt-23.05_mvebu/cortexa53` completed successfully.
f00b4r0 has quit [Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com]
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
<mrkiko> Ansuel: ok, doing so
<mrkiko> Ansuel: on what devices did you test this? Asking to understand if it would be useful for you to test this on a FB7530 or if you did so already
minimal has joined #openwrt-devel
<mrkiko> Ansuel: didn't know you fixed VDSL :D re-compiling now
rua has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
<mrkiko> Ansuel: maybe I can paste the failure on the PR
<mrkiko> I guess it's a bug if the download script checks the hash of files it produced in a previous step by packing git checkouts...
<mrkiko> even because any time the hash is different so clearly something is going wrong
<mrkiko> and we are wasting resources
rua has joined #openwrt-devel
kenny has joined #openwrt-devel
goliath has quit [Quit: SIGSEGV]
goliath has joined #openwrt-devel
<aparcar> any ideas why the CI is sad here? https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/actions/runs/8401694749/job/23011580797?pr=14960#step:34:505 it says argument list to long...?!
<owrt-images-builds> Build [#128](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/52/builds/128) of `master_ramips/mt76x8` completed successfully.
nixuser has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<dwfreed> aparcar: start by patching hostapd to remove the @ on line 83 here: https://w1.fi/cgit/hostap/tree/src/build.rules#n83
<owrt-images-builds> Build [#129](https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders/51/builds/129) of `master_ramips/rt3883` completed successfully.
<dwfreed> so that make will print the command being run
nixuser has joined #openwrt-devel
<mrkiko> I am modifying the source code of a package - ltq-vdsl. Is there a "canonical" way to generate patches? Or should it be done by hand?
<PaulFertser> mrkiko: quilt
<mrkiko> PaulFertser: uh!! ok
<PaulFertser> mrkiko: if you mean the source of the packaged software with additional OpenWrt patches on top
<PaulFertser> mrkiko: if you mean OpenWrt packaging itself, then it's just regular git workflow for improving existing files
<mrkiko> PaulFertser: thanks a lot. Yeah, I will need quilt. But first of all I'll need to get this to compile :D
<mrkiko> PaulFertser: no, I'll need quilt. Nothing hurts like when the builsystem plays against you :D
<PaulFertser> mrkiko: probably when it's the compiler? Or assembler?
<mrkiko> PaulFertser: well yeah
<mrnuke> QCA-SSDK is magic! It doesn't compile at firt. You fix a bunch of issues and it compiles. You git stash, start from scratch, and compiles again!
<mrnuke> What a @#$%^&* nightmare
<robimarko> SSDK is pure chaos
<robimarko> Its magic that it even compiles
<mrnuke> It's #ifdef heaven. Very tasty spaghetti code!
<mrnuke> I got qca-ssdk built for ipq95xx. Now trying qca-nss-dp. It's trying to include files that are not even in the source tree!
<mrnuke> Then edma-v2/edma.h uses some defines tha are defined in ... soc_ops. IN a header that nobody #includes
<mrnuke> Even an intern using cuneiform would do betther than that if you just took away the preprocessor
<mrnuke> robimarko: BTW, your prior work and buildroot repo have been extremely helpful thusfar
<robimarko> mrnuke: oh nice to see somebody use that, it really helps with upstreaming stuff and running latest kernels
<mrnuke> I like that I can use LINUX_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR and essentially use a linux clone with full git functionality
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
<mrnuke> robimarko: any iudea what this "ppe_drv" is that I see referenced in edma-v2 (qca-nss-dp) ?
<robimarko> mrnuke: Its the package processor engine
<robimarko> There is a separate driver for it in NSS-DRV as far as I remember
<robimarko> Actually, its a separate repo these days
<mrnuke> Fun! I have to pull that into the buildroot!
<mrnuke> Thanks you!
Borromini has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
<mrkiko> PaulFertser: even tough I do "quilt new ...", then "quilt add", quilt seems to not see my changes to the specified file. It worked fine on a file under src before, but not now where I am editing a file in src/common/something
<PaulFertser> mrkiko: you should use "quilt edit" for changing the file :/
<mrkiko> PaulFertser: so the wiki isn't fully correct, since "edit" is decribed as ashortcut, while it is not only a shortcut
<PaulFertser> mrkiko: ah yes, if you do quilt add prior to changing you can change it by other means.
<mrkiko> PaulFertser: but apparently I am doing something wrong somewhereelse and quilt won't see that change. mhmmm
<mrkiko> well, in the end it worked so it's something I am overlooking. But overall nice
Borromini has quit [Ping timeout: 480 seconds]
<mrkiko> it was me, I was using the wrong pakage. Should admit I dnd't choose an easy target to start learning :D
Borromini has joined #openwrt-devel
Borromini has quit []
fakuivan has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<mrkiko> so - we have a problem of implicit enum conversions and at the moment the scenario looks like the following: a set of macros returns values that are implicitly casted to different return types, depending on the function we are, sometimes dsl_boolean_t, sometimes (most of the times) dsl_error_t
<mrkiko> I am trying to explicitly cast all the call-sites, but I don't now if this is the right approach; other ideas coming to mind are disable the related compiler warning somehow (not going to fly probably) or maybe other C stuff I don't knowof
robimarko has quit [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.]
<oliv3r> Mrnuke; is this new?!?! I need this :) LINUX_OVERRIDE_SRCDIR
<oliv3r> Hmm, looks like a built root thing.
<oliv3r> Though I now think I may have used something like this already
Piraty has joined #openwrt-devel
<Piraty> aparcar: re https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/14918 , careful with the date version scheme, some upstreams were found to later use real versions strings later, so it's good advised to 0.0.0.20231231 or similar
<Piraty> can i read about the rationale behind 1. the move off of openwrt's opkg 2. to move to apk (over, let's say yocto's fork of opkg) ?
<mrnuke> oliv3r: yes, it's a buildroot thing. not sure if openwrt has something similar
<mrnuke> This thing really gets me in QCA Makefiles: "Makefile:ccflags-y += -Wall -Werror"
<mrnuke> Why would they turn on -Werror on code that's already very questionable?