00:20 <steev> bamse: fwiw, i also get the hpage thing on the c630 on next too, it's not specific to the thinkpad - https://paste.debian.net/hidden/bfdc0c63

19:06 <akaWolf0> I've found here https://download.lenovo.com/pccbbs/mobiles/n3huj11w.txt a fix «- (Fix) Fixed Battery Damage issue», does someone knows what is it about?

19:11 <steev> bamse: are you able to suspend/resume your c630 on next?

19:16 <bamse> steev: i've not booted it in ages

19:17 <steev> heh

19:20 <steev> we also seem to have lost most sensors

19:21 <steev> thermal sensors*

19:29 <bamse> okay, will have to take a look at the 845 support then

20:15 <steev> bamse: so... this is what i've come up with to make dtbs_check (mostly) happy - obviously it pitches a fit about the missing regulators, but... for some reason this seems to break it here? like... i just don't understand how adding -pins breaks things- https://paste.debian.net/hidden/2bebf5ca/

20:16 <akaWolf0> do you have any hw indication of low charge in x13s? like flashing power LED when less then 20%?

20:16 <steev> no

20:17 <akaWolf0> I'm afraid if I let my desktop with enabled Linux it will discharged too much and doesn't power on again :)

20:18 <steev> well, then you can stay in windows until linux support is further along :)

20:18 <akaWolf0> qcom_battmgr.pmic_glink_power_supply unknown notification: 0x81

20:19 <steev> yes

20:19 <akaWolf0> I guess that one for low charge.

20:19 <steev> no

20:19 <steev> that is taken care of in a newer revision of the patchset

20:20 <akaWolf0> steev: I have no intention to stay in Windows, I just want to understand is there any low level protection against low discharge or no

20:20 <steev> - Handle battery information update notifications (0x81), instead of complaining in the log.

20:36 <akaWolf0> steev: which kernel branch should I use to get most recent updates?

20:38 <steev> probably jhovold's 6.2.0-rc6

20:42 <akaWolf0> https://github.com/jhovold/linux/tree/wip/sc8280xp-v6.2-rc6 that one?

20:43 <steev> yes